ArticleJournal of reproductive immunology2010
Maternal immunity partially protects newborn mice against a Chlamydia trachomatis intranasal challenge.
Article in Journal of reproductive immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization of the Horizontal and Vertical Sexual Transmission ofInfection and immunity · 2019Article
- IgA modulates respiratory dysfunction as a sequela to pulmonary chlamydial infection as neonates.Pathogens and disease · 2016Article
- Mechanism of T-cell mediated protection in newborn mice against a Chlamydia infection.Microbes and infectionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To determine the role of maternal immunity in protecting newborn mice against a Chlamydia trachomatis infection, female BALB/c mice were immunized intranasally (i.n.) with 10⁴ inclusion forming units (IFU) of the C. trachomatis mouse pneumonitis biovar (MoPn). As a control, another group of female mice was sham-immunized i.n. with HeLa cell extracts. Immunized animals mounted strong immune responses as evidenced by high Chlamydia-specific antibody titers in serum and milk. Newborn mice born from immunized and sham-immunized dams were challenged i.n. with 10³IFU of MoPn at two post-natal days (PND). Following inoculation, newborn mice were euthanized at 7- and 18-PND and the lungs, spleen and intestine were cultured for Chlamydia. Overall, no significant differences were observed between the mice born from and fed by immunized dams and mice born from and fed by sham-immunized dams. Of the mice born from immunized dams, 75 and 25% had positive lung cultures at 7- and 18-PND, respectively. Of the mice born from sham-immunized dams, 82 and 50% had positive lung cultures for those same days. When the number of IFU recovered from the lungs and spleens was compared between the two groups no significant differences were observed. However, when the number of IFU recovered from the small intestine was compared, significant differences were observed between the two groups of newborn mice (2×10⁵ versus 32×10⁶ at 7-PND and 9.2×10⁶ versus 85×10⁶ at 18-PND). In conclusion, maternal immunity plays a limited role in protecting newborn mice against a Chlamydia infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.