Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20553671›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2010

Item response theory analysis of DSM-IV criteria for inhalant-use disorders in adolescents.

Brian E Perron, Michael G Vaughn, Matthew O Howard, Amy Bohnert, Erick Guerrero

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An Item Response Theory Analysis ofFrontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Does DSM-5 nomenclature for inhalant use disorder improve upon DSM-IV?Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian E PerronSchool of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, #3849, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1106, USA. beperron@umich.edu
Michael G Vaughn
Matthew O Howard
Amy Bohnert
Erick Guerrero
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USSouthern California University for Professional Studies · US

Funding

Natural History, Comorbid Mental Disorders, and Consequences of Inhalant AbuseR01DA021405 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW O · 2007 to 2009
$567k
Symptoms and Structure of Inhalant Use DisordersR03DA027832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PERRON, BRIAN E · 2009 to 2010
$154k
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC IMPAIRMENT IN ADOLESCENT INHALANT USERSR03DA015929 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOWARD, MATTHEW O · 2002 to 2003
$153k
NIDA NIH HHS DA021405NIDA NIH HHS DA027832NIDA NIH HHS DA15929NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021405NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA015929NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA027832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInhalants are a serious public health concern and a dangerous form of substance use. An important unresolved issue in the inhalant literature concerns the validity of inhalant-use diagnoses and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, distinction between inhalant abuse and inhalant dependence. To address these limitations and provide the foundation for helping build stronger diagnostic and assessment tools related to inhalant problems, this study examined the dimensionality of the criteria set and the abuse-dependence distinction using item response theory (IRT) analysis.

methodThis study used data from a survey of the population of Missouri Division of Youth Services' residents of the residential treatment system. The current study focused on adolescents and young adults who reported a lifetime history of inhalant use (N = 279).

resultsThe results from the IRT analysis showed no consistent hierarchical ordering of abuse and dependence criteria, providing strong evidence against the abuse-dependence distinction. The abuse criterion of legal problems associated with use represented the item with the highest level of inhalant severity. The dependence criterion that was related to giving up important social, occupational, or recreational activities provided the most accurate discrimination between individuals at different levels of severity.

conclusionsInhalant-use disorders are best represented using a dimensional versus a categorical approach. IRT analysis provides guidance for selecting criteria that can be useful for brief assessments of inhalant-use problems.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersModels, PsychologicalResidential TreatmentAdministration, InhalationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMissouriSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID20553671
PMCPMC2887928
OpenAlexW2092941589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.