Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20552637›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2010

Modeling maternal-offspring gene-gene interactions: the extended-MFG test.

Erica J Childs, Christina G S Palmer, Kenneth Lange, Janet S Sinsheimer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mendel: the Swiss army knife of genetic analysis programs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erica J ChildsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Christina G S Palmer
Kenneth Lange
Janet S Sinsheimer
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR GENE MAPPINGR01GM053275 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LANGE, KENNETH L · 1995 to 2019
$9.3M
Training Grant in Genomic Analysis and InterpretationT32HG002536 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Valerie A Arboleda, Harold Pimentel · 2002 to 2026
$8.6M
Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping in Human PedigreesR37MH059490 · NIMH · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BLANGERO, JOHN · 2001 to 2010
$6.8M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING IN HUMAN PEDIGREESR01MH059490 · NIMH · SOUTHWEST FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI BLANGERO, JOHN · 1998 to 2000
$426k
Maternal/fetal genotype incompatibility in schizophreniaR21MH066001 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SINSHEIMER, JANET S · 2002 to 2003
$305k
Statistical Models of Maternal and Offspring Genetic Effects For Risk of DiseaseF31HG005056 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHILDS, ERICA JOY · 2009 to 2010
$43k
NHGRI NIH HHS F31 HG005056NHGRI NIH HHS F31-HG005056-01NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002536NHGRI NIH HHS T32-HG02536NIGMS NIH HHS GM53275NIMH NIH HHS MH59490NIMH NIH HHS MH66001NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH066001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal-fetal genotype (MFG) incompatibility is an interaction between the genes of a mother and offspring at a particular locus that adversely affects the developing fetus, thereby increasing susceptibility to disease. Statistical methods for examining MFG incompatibility as a disease risk factor have been developed for nuclear families. Because families collected as part of a study can be large and complex, containing multiple generations and marriage loops, we create the Extended-MFG (EMFG) Test, a model-based likelihood approach, to allow for arbitrary family structures. We modify the MFG test by replacing the nuclear-family based "mating type" approach with Ott's representation of a pedigree likelihood and calculating MFG incompatibility along with the Mendelian transmission probability. In order to allow for extension to arbitrary family structures, we make a slightly more stringent assumption of random mating with respect to the locus of interest. Simulations show that the EMFG test has appropriate type-I error rate, power, and precise parameter estimation when random mating holds. Our simulations and real data example illustrate that the chief advantages of the EMFG test over the earlier nuclear family version of the MFG test are improved accuracy of parameter estimation and power gains in the presence of missing genotypes.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalNuclear FamilyAllelesComputer SimulationFamily HealthFemaleGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsMothersPedigreePregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20552637
PMCPMC3165170
OpenAlexW2139614801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.