Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20552423›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2010

In vitro assays of rod and cone opsin activity: retinoid analogs as agonists and inverse agonists.

Masahiro Kono, Rosalie K Crouch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masahiro KonoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina, Room 511, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Rosalie K Crouch
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

SYNTHETIC RETINAL PIGMENTS AND BINDING PROTEINSR01EY004939 · NEI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CROUCH, ROSALIE K · 1985 to 2011
$4.2M
Cone Opsin-Ligand Interactions and Photoreceptor HealthR01EY019515 · NEI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KONO, MASAHIRO · 2009 to 2014
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY004939NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upon absorption of a photon, the bound 11-cis-retinoid isomerizes to the all-trans form resulting in a protein conformational change that enables it to activate its G protein, transducin, to begin the visual signal transduction cascade. The native ligand, 11-cis-retinal, acts as an inverse agonist to both the apoproteins of rod and cone visual pigments (opsins); all-trans-retinal is an agonist. Truncated analogs of retinal have been used to characterize structure-function relationships with rod opsins, but little has been done with cone opsins. Activation of transducin by an opsin is one method to characterize the conformational state of the opsin. This chapter describes an in vitro transducin activation assay that can be used with cone opsins to determine the degree to which different ligands can act as an agonist or an inverse agonist to gain insight into the ligand-binding pocket of cone opsins and differences between the different classes of opsins. The understanding of the effects of ligands on cone opsin activity can potentially be applied to future therapeutic agents targeting opsins.

Indexed as

Drug Inverse AgonismAnimalsCattleCell MembraneChlorocebus aethiopsCone OpsinsCOS CellsHumansRetinaldehydeRod OpsinsTransducinCone OpsinsRetinaldehydeRod OpsinsTransducin

Identifiers

PMID20552423
PMCPMC3694563
OpenAlexW107112169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.