Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20552264›Full record

ReviewBehavior genetics2010

The complexity of alcohol drinking: studies in rodent genetic models.

John C Crabbe, Tamara J Phillips, John K Belknap

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Animal Models of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Rodents.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Increased Voluntary Alcohol Consumption in Mice Lacking GABAFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Rigor and reproducibility in rodent behavioral research.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019
    Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John C CrabbePortland Alcohol Research Center, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. crabbe@ohsu.edu
Tamara J Phillips
John K Belknap
Oregon Health & Science University · USPortland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Selective Breeding for Drinking in the Circadian DarkU01AA013519 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Angela Renee Ozburn · 2001 to 2026
$10.9M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
Alcohol selected mice: Comparative withdrawal syndromesR01AA006243 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI BELKNAP, JOHN K · 1985 to 2008
$2.4M
Mapping and Microarray Gene Expression Analysis in a Model of Excessive DrinkingU01AA016655 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2006 to 2010
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA013519NIAAA NIH HHS AA016655NIAAA NIH HHS AA06243NIAAA NIH HHS AA10760NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA006243NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013519NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk for alcohol dependence in humans has substantial genetic contributions. Successful rodent models generally attempt to address only selected features of the human diagnosis. Most such models target the phenotype of oral administration of alcohol solutions, usually consumption of or preference for an alcohol solution versus water. Data from rats and mice for more than 50 years have shown genetic influences on preference drinking and related phenotypes. This paper summarizes some key findings from that extensive literature. Much has been learned, including the genomic location and possible identity of several genes influencing preference drinking. We report new information from congenic lines confirming QTLs for drinking on mouse chromosomes 2 and 9. There are many strengths of the various phenotypic assays used to study drinking, but there are also some weaknesses. One major weakness, the lack of drinking excessively enough to become intoxicated, has recently been addressed with a new genetic animal model, mouse lines selectively bred for their high and intoxicating blood alcohol levels after a limited period of drinking in the circadian dark. We report here results from a second replicate of that selection and compare them with the first replicate.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAnimalsChromosomes, MammalianGenotypeMiceMice, CongenicMice, Inbred StrainsPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociRats

Identifiers

PMID20552264
PMCPMC3330823
OpenAlexW2007018752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.