Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20552217›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2011

PopAffiliator: online calculator for individual affiliation to a major population group based on 17 autosomal short tandem repeat genotype profile.

Luísa Pereira, Farida Alshamali, Rune Andreassen, Ruth Ballard, Wasun Chantratita, Nam Soo Cho, Clotilde Coudray, Jean-Michel Dugoujon, Marta Espinoza, Fabricio González-Andrade and 14 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Forensic genetics through the lens of Lewontin: population structure, ancestry and race.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Luísa PereiraInstituto de Patologia e Imunologia Molecular da Universidade do Porto, R. Dr. Roberto Frias s/n, Porto, Portugal. lpereira@ipatimup.pt
Farida Alshamali
Rune Andreassen
Ruth Ballard
Wasun Chantratita
Nam Soo Cho
Clotilde Coudray
Jean-Michel Dugoujon
Marta Espinoza
Fabricio González-Andrade
Sibte Hadi
Uta-Dorothee Immel
Catalin Marian
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin
Gerhard Mertens
Walther Parson
Carlos Perone
Lourdes Prieto
Haruo Takeshita
Héctor Rangel Villalobos
Zhaoshu Zeng
Lev Zhivotovsky
Rui Camacho
Nuno A Fonseca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of their sensitivity and high level of discrimination, short tandem repeat (STR) maker systems are currently the method of choice in routine forensic casework and data banking, usually in multiplexes up to 15-17 loci. Constraints related to sample amount and quality, frequently encountered in forensic casework, will not allow to change this picture in the near future, notwithstanding the technological developments. In this study, we present a free online calculator named PopAffiliator ( http://cracs.fc.up.pt/popaffiliator ) for individual population affiliation in the three main population groups, Eurasian, East Asian and sub-Saharan African, based on genotype profiles for the common set of STRs used in forensics. This calculator performs affiliation based on a model constructed using machine learning techniques. The model was constructed using a data set of approximately fifteen thousand individuals collected for this work. The accuracy of individual population affiliation is approximately 86%, showing that the common set of STRs routinely used in forensics provide a considerable amount of information for population assignment, in addition to being excellent for individual identification.

Indexed as

GenotypeArtificial IntelligenceComputersForensic GeneticsGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersGenetics, PopulationHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsPopulation GroupsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.