Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20551973›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Biology and pathogenesis of chikungunya virus.

Olivier Schwartz, Matthew L Albert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 415 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
415citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

415 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Automated Counting of Chikungunya Virus-Formed Plaques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Autoantibodies neutralizing type I interferons underlie a third of cases of Chikungunya virus encephalitis or myelitis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The SMARCA4-TMEM47 axis plays an essential role in chikungunya virus RNA replication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Discovering Novel Therapeutic VbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

355 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olivier SchwartzInstitut Pasteur, 28 rue du Dr Roux, Paris 75724 Cedex 15, France. schwartz@pasteur.fr
Matthew L Albert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a re-emerging mosquito-borne alphavirus responsible for a recent, unexpectedly severe epidemic in countries of the Indian Ocean region. Although many alphaviruses have been well studied, little was known about the biology and pathogenesis of CHIKV at the time of the 2005 outbreak. Over the past 5 years there has been a multidisciplinary effort aimed at deciphering the clinical, physiopathological, immunological and virological features of CHIKV infection. This Review highlights some of the most recent advances in our understanding of the biology of CHIKV and its interactions with the host.

Indexed as

Alphavirus InfectionsAnimalsChikungunya virusHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumans

Identifiers

PMID20551973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.