Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20551948›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2010

Stem cell therapies for spinal cord injury.

Vibhu Sahni, John A Kessler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Is cell transplantation a reliable therapeutic strategy for spinal cord injury in clinical practice? A systematic review and meta-analysis from 22 clinical controlled trials.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Biomaterials and cell-based therapy post spinal cord injury.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vibhu SahniMGH-HMS Center for Nervous System Repair, Harvard Medical School, 50 Blossom Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
John A Kessler
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Regenerative Scaffold Technologies for CNS and DiabetesR01EB003806 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI STUPP, SAMUEL I · 2004 to 2015
$10.7M
REGULATION OF NEUROTRANSMITTER METABOLISMR01NS020778 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KESSLER, JOHN A · 1985 to 2014
$4.6M
MECHANISMS GOVERNING NEURONAL DEVELOPMENTR01NS020013 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI KESSLER, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$4.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003806NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020013NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS020778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cell therapy is a potential treatment for spinal cord injury (SCI), and a variety of different stem cell types have been evaluated in animal models and humans with SCI. No consensus exists regarding the type of stem cell, if any, that will prove to be effective therapeutically. Most data suggest that no single therapy will be sufficient to overcome all the biological complications caused by SCI. Rationales for therapeutic use of stem cells for SCI include replacement of damaged neurons and glial cells, secretion of trophic factors, regulation of gliosis and scar formation, prevention of cyst formation, and enhancement of axon elongation. Most therapeutic approaches that use stem cells involve implantation of these cells into the spinal cord. The attendant risks of stem cell therapy for SCI--including tumor formation, or abnormal circuit formation leading to dysfunction--must be weighed against the potential benefits of this approach. This Review will examine the biological effects of SCI, the opportunities for stem cell treatment, and the types of stem cells that might be used therapeutically. The limited information available on the possible benefits of stem cell therapy to humans will also be discussed.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAxonsClinical Trials as TopicHumansNerve RegenerationNeuronsSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID20551948
PMCPMC3755897
OpenAlexW1987467507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.