Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20550908›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

An electrostatic model for DNA surface hybridization.

Ian Y Wong, Nicholas A Melosh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biosensors · 2021
    Article
  10. Messenger RNA enrichment using synthetic oligo(T) click nucleic acids.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Structural Enthalpy in Spherical Nucleic Acid Hybridization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ian Y WongGeballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Nicholas A Melosh
Stanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA hybridization at surfaces is a crucial process for biomolecular detection, genotyping, and gene expression analysis. However, hybridization density and kinetics can be strongly inhibited by electric fields from the negatively charged DNA as the reaction proceeds. Here, we develop an electrostatic model to optimize hybridization density and kinetics as a function of DNA surface density, salt concentrations, and applied voltages. The electrostatic repulsion from a DNA surface layer is calculated numerically and incorporated into a modified Langmuir scheme, allowing kinetic suppression of hybridization. At the low DNA probe densities typically used in assays (<10(13)/cm(2)), electrostatics effects are largely screened and hybridization is completed with fast kinetics. However, higher hybridization densities can be achieved at intermediate DNA surface densities, albeit with slower kinetics. The application of positive voltages circumvents issues resulting from the very high DNA probe density, allowing highly enhanced hybridization densities and accelerated kinetics, and validating recent experimental measurements.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularStatic ElectricityDNANucleic Acid ConformationNucleic Acid HybridizationReproducibility of ResultsSaltsSurface PropertiesDNASalts

Identifiers

PMID20550908
PMCPMC2884251
OpenAlexW2061599300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.