ArticlePreventing chronic disease2010
Lessons learned from a collaborative to improve care for patients with diabetes in 17 community health centers, Massachusetts, 2006.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Context, mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for diabetes mellitus type 2: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2015Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers of implementing the chronic care model in primary care: a systematic review.BMC family practice · 2015Pooled it
- Reducing inequity in primary care clinics treating low socioeconomic Jewish and Arab populations in Israel.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Factors influencing the adoption of self-management solutions: an interpretive synthesis of the literature on stakeholder experiences.Implementation science : IS · 2015Review
- Article
- Applying systems engineering to implement an evidence-based intervention at a community health center.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn 2006, the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers convened a collaborative to systematically improve health care delivery for patients with diabetes in 17 community health centers. Our goal was to identify facilitators of and barriers to success reported by teams that participated in this collaborative.
methodsThe collaborative's activities lasted 13 months. At their conclusion, we interviewed participating team members. We asked about their teams' successes, challenges, and take-home messages for future collaborative efforts. We organized their responses into common themes by using the Chronic Care Model as a framework.
resultsThemes that emerged as facilitators of success included shifting clinic focus to more actively involve patients and to promote their self-management; improving the understanding and implementation of professional guidelines; and expanding staff roles to accommodate these goals. Patient registries were perceived as beneficial but lacking adequate technical support. Other barriers were staffing and time constraints.
conclusionCooperative efforts to improve health care delivery for people with diabetes may benefit from educating the health care team about guidelines, establishing a stronger role for the patient as part of the health care team, and providing adequate technical instruction and support for the use of clinical databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20550841PMC2901581W1550347373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.