ArticlePreventing chronic disease2010
Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State.
Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of US smoke-free air laws on restaurants and bars by employer size: a panel study.BMJ open · 2017Observational
- Multiple streams approach to tobacco control policymaking in a tobacco-growing state.Journal of community health · 2014Article
- The economic impact of smoke-free laws on restaurants and bars in 9 States.Preventing chronic disease · 2013Article
- Did copayment changes reduce health service utilization among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama.Health services research · 2012Article
- Program, policy, and price interventions for tobacco control: quantifying the return on investment of a state tobacco control program.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Economic effect of smoke-free ordinances on 11 Missouri cities.Preventing chronic disease · 2012Article
- Regression model fitting with quadratic term leads to different conclusion in economic analysis of Washington state smoking ban.Preventing chronic disease · 2011Article
- Economic impact of a smoke-free ordinance on bars and restaurants in a small, rural, Missouri community.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContinued progress in implementing smoke-free laws throughout the United States would benefit from documenting positive economic effects, particularly for the hospitality industry. This study describes changes in sales revenue in bars and taverns since December 2005, when a statewide smoke-free law in Washington State went into effect.
methodsUsing 24 quarters of inflation-adjusted taxable retail sales data from 2002 through 2007, we fitted a regression model to estimate the effect of the smoke-free law on sales revenue, controlling for seasonality and other economic factors.
resultsWe found no immediate change in bar revenues in the first quarter of 2006, but taxable retail sales grew significantly through the fourth quarter of 2007. In the 2 years after the smoke-free law was implemented, sales revenues were $105.5 million higher than expected for bars and taverns in Washington State.
conclusionThe higher-than-expected revenue from taxable sales in bars and taverns after the implementation of smoke-free laws in Washington State provided extra funds to the state general fund. Potential increases in revenue in other jurisdictions that implement smoke-free indoor air policies could provide funds to benefit residents of those jurisdictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20550837PMC2901577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.