Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20550671›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2010

Chromosome differentiation patterns during cichlid fish evolution.

Andréia B Poletto, Irani A Ferreira, Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello, Rafael T Nakajima, Juliana Mazzuchelli, Heraldo B Ribeiro, Paulo C Venere, Mauro Nirchio, Thomas D Kocher, Cesar Martins

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Near-complete genomes for nine haplochromine cichlid fishes reveal a novel centromeric satellite structure organised around a pair of inverted elements.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome assemblies forFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Origin of a Giant Sex Chromosome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Extensive Chromosomal Reorganization inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andréia B PolettoDepartamento de Morfologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Irani A Ferreira
Diogo C Cabral-de-Mello
Rafael T Nakajima
Juliana Mazzuchelli
Heraldo B Ribeiro
Paulo C Venere
Mauro Nirchio
Thomas D Kocher
Cesar Martins

Funding

Gene networks regulating sex determination in vertebratesR01HD058635 · NICHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KOCHER, THOMAS D. · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCichlid fishes have been the subject of increasing scientific interest because of their rapid adaptive radiation which has led to an extensive ecological diversity and their enormous importance to tropical and subtropical aquaculture. To increase our understanding of chromosome evolution among cichlid species, karyotypes of one Asian, 22 African, and 30 South American cichlid species were investigated, and chromosomal data of the family was reviewed.

resultsAlthough there is extensive variation in the karyotypes of cichlid fishes (from 2n = 32 to 2n = 60 chromosomes), the modal chromosome number for South American species was 2n = 48 and the modal number for the African ones was 2n = 44. The only Asian species analyzed, Etroplus maculatus, was observed to have 46 chromosomes. The presence of one or two macro B chromosomes was detected in two African species. The cytogenetic mapping of 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene revealed a variable number of clusters among species varying from two to six.

conclusionsThe karyotype diversification of cichlids seems to have occurred through several chromosomal rearrangements involving fissions, fusions and inversions. It was possible to identify karyotype markers for the subfamilies Pseudocrenilabrinae (African) and Cichlinae (American). The karyotype analyses did not clarify the phylogenetic relationship among the Cichlinae tribes. On the other hand, the two major groups of Pseudocrenilabrinae (tilapiine and haplochromine) were clearly discriminated based on the characteristics of their karyotypes. The cytogenetic mapping of 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA) gene did not follow the chromosome diversification in the family. The dynamic evolution of the repeated units of rRNA genes generates patterns of chromosomal distribution that do not help follows the phylogenetic relationships among taxa. The presence of B chromosomes in cichlids is of particular interest because they may not be represented in the reference genome sequences currently being obtained.

Indexed as

ChromosomesEvolution, MolecularAnimalsChromosome MappingCichlidsKaryotypingRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID20550671
PMCPMC2896337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.