Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20550650›Full record

Trial reportCardiovascular diabetology2010

The Chronic CARe for diAbeTes study (CARAT): a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Anja Frei, Corinne Chmiel, Hansueli Schläpfer, Beatrice Birnbaum, Ulrike Held, Johann Steurer, Thomas Rosemann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Patients' experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrated care organizations in Switzerland.International journal of integrated care · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anja FreiInstitute of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. anja.frei@usz.ch
Corinne Chmiel
Hansueli Schläpfer
Beatrice Birnbaum
Ulrike Held
Johann Steurer
Thomas Rosemann
University of Zurich · CHSwiss Academy of Medical Sciences · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes is a major challenge for the health care system and especially for the primary care provider. The Chronic Care Model represents an evidence-based framework for the care for chronically ill. An increasing number of studies showed that implementing elements of the Chronic Care Model improves patient relevant outcomes and process parameters. However, most of these findings have been performed in settings different from the Swiss health care system which is dominated by single handed practices. METHODS/

designCARAT is a cluster randomized controlled trial with general practitioners as the unit of randomization (trial registration: ISRCTN05947538). The study challenges the hypothesis that implementing several elements of the Chronic Care Model via a specially trained practice nurse improves the HbA1c level of diabetes type II patients significantly after one year (primary outcome). Furthermore, we assume that the intervention increases the proportion of patients who achieve the recommended targets regarding blood pressure (<130/80), HbA1c (=<6.5%) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (<2.6 mmol/l), increases patients' quality of life (SF-36) and several evidence-based quality indicators for diabetes care. These improvements in care will be experienced by the patients (PACIC-5A) as well as by the practice team (ACIC). According to the power calculation, 28 general practitioners will be randomized either to the intervention group or to the control group. Each general practitioner will include 12 patients suffering from diabetes type II. In the intervention group the general practitioner as well as the practice nurse will be trained to perform care for diabetes patients according to the Chronic Care Model in teamwork. In the control group no intervention will be applied at all and patients will be treated as usual. Measurements (pre-data-collection) will take place in months II-IV, starting in February 2010. Follow-up data will be collected after 1 year. DISCUSSION: This study challenges the hypothesis that the Chronic Care Model can be easily implemented by a practice nurse focused approach. If our results will confirm this hypothesis the suggestion arises whether this approach should be implemented in other chronic diseases and multimorbid patients and how to redesign care in Switzerland.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFamily PracticeNurse's RoleBiomarkersBlood PressureCholesterol, LDLChronic DiseaseCluster AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinGuideline AdherenceHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of LifeBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, human

Identifiers

PMID20550650
PMCPMC2902433
OpenAlexW2139507038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.