Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20550408›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2010

A statistical mechanical theory for a two-dimensional model of water.

Tomaz Urbic, Ken A Dill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Simple Model of Liquid Water Dynamics.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Water Is a Cagey Liquid.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analytical model for three-dimensional Mercedes-Benz water molecules.Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics · 2012
    Article
  14. Simple model of hydrophobic hydration.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomaz UrbicFaculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 5, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. tomaz.urbic@fkkt.uni-lj.si
Ken A Dill

Funding

Modeling Aqueous Solvation in BiologyR01GM063592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DILL, KEN A · 2001 to 2018
$4.3M
Modeling Aqueous Solvation in BiologyR56GM063592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DILL, KEN A · 2009 to 2009
$330k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM063592NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063592NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM063592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a statistical mechanical model for the thermal and volumetric properties of waterlike fluids. Each water molecule is a two-dimensional disk with three hydrogen-bonding arms. Each water interacts with neighboring waters through a van der Waals interaction and an orientation-dependent hydrogen-bonding interaction. This model, which is largely analytical, is a variant of the Truskett and Dill (TD) treatment of the "Mercedes-Benz" (MB) model. The present model gives better predictions than TD for hydrogen-bond populations in liquid water by distinguishing strong cooperative hydrogen bonds from weaker ones. We explore properties versus temperature T and pressure p. We find that the volumetric and thermal properties follow the same trends with T as real water and are in good general agreement with Monte Carlo simulations of MB water, including the density anomaly, the minimum in the isothermal compressibility, and the decreased number of hydrogen bonds for increasing temperature. The model reproduces that pressure squeezes out water's heat capacity and leads to a negative thermal expansion coefficient at low temperatures. In terms of water structuring, the variance in hydrogen-bonding angles increases with both T and p, while the variance in water density increases with T but decreases with p. Hydrogen bonding is an energy storage mechanism that leads to water's large heat capacity (for its size) and to the fragility in its cagelike structures, which are easily melted by temperature and pressure to a more van der Waals-like liquid state.

Indexed as

EntropyHydrogen BondingProbabilityTemperatureWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID20550408
PMCPMC2902533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.