ArticleDer Orthopade2010
[Cement distribution in vertebroplasty pedicle screws with different designs].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The benefit of cement-augmented pedicle screws for revision surgery in osteoporotic bone - a cadaveric study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Characterization and Biomechanical Study of a Novel Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The effect of cement augmentation on pedicle screw fixation under various load cases : results from a combined experimental, micro-CT, and micro-finite element analysis.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019Article
- Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013Article
- Intraoperative PEEP-ventilation during PMMA-injection for augmented pedicle screws: improvement of leakage rate in spinal surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of deteriorated bone density become particularly apparent in cases where spinal instrumentation is needed. Cement augmentation of pedicle screws for better bone purchase became the subject of many studies, which proved the biomechanical superiority and the increased pullout strength of cement augmented screws. Inadequate, and sometimes dangerous, cement distribution made the need for development of special implants inevitable. Pedicle screws with side openings and a central drill hole allow cement augmentation through the implant and increase not only the screw diameter but also the interfacial strength between the three components (screw-cement-bone). Accordingly cement distribution can be affected by the selection of the side openings (size and position). Screws with conical core and distally situated side openings facilitate the development of uniform cement dough.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20549485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.