Trial reportWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2010
Noninvasive ventilation in pediatric acute respiratory failure by means of a conventional volumetric ventilator.
Trial report in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Non-invasive Ventilation Compared to Intubation in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure: A Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Clinical Profile and Outcome of Children Requiring Noninvasive Ventilation (NIV).Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022Observational
- Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure in children: a concise review.Annals of intensive care · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory failure (ARF) is one of the main causes for admission to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) by a volumetric ventilator with a specific mode in pediatric acute respiratory failure.
methodsA three-year prospective non-controlled study was undertaken in children with ARF who had received NIV delivered by Evita 2 Dura with NIV mode through a nonvented oronasal mask.
resultsThirty-two episodes of ARF were observed in 26 patients. Pneumonia was observed in most of the children (46.8%). Pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score was 12.4% ± 24% (range 0-84%). Peak inspiratory pressure was 18.5 ± 2.7 cmH₂O, positive end-expiratory pressure 5.7 ± 1.1 cmH₂O, pressure support 10.5 ± 2.7 cmH₂O, and mean pressure 9.2 ± 2 cmH₂O. The clinical score was improved progressively within the first 6 hours. Before the initiation of NIV, respiratory rate was 41.7 ± 16.3, heart rate 131.6 ± 25.8, systolic arterial pressure 108 ± 19.5, diastolic arterial pressure 58.2 ± 13.9, pH 7.33 ± 0.12, pCO₂ 55.1 ± 20.2, SatO₂ 87.8 ± 9.9 and FiO₂ 0.55 ± 0.25. There was a significant improvement in the respiratory rate, heart rate, pH, pCO₂ and SatO₂ at 2-4 hours. This improvement was kept throughout the first 24 hours. The level of FiO₂ was significantly lower at 24 hours. Radiological improvement was observed after 24 hours in 17 out of 26 patients. The duration of NIV was 85.4 ± 62.8 hours. Complications were defined as minor. Only 4 patients required intubation. All patients survived.
conclusionsNIV can be successfully applied to infants and children with ARF using this volumetric ventilator with specific NIV mode. It should be considered particularly in children whose underlying condition warrants avoidance of intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20549410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.