ArticleThe AAPS journal2010
Investigation of the ovarian and prostate cancer peptidome for candidate early detection markers using a novel nanoparticle biomarker capture technology.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05338060 (A Systems Approach to Immunotherapy Biomarker Identification Within the Postoperative Wound-Healing Microenvironment in Patients With Gastroesophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Systems Approach to Immunotherapy Biomarker Identification Within the Postoperative Wound-Healing Microenvironment in Patients With Gastroesophageal Cancer
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel-based devices for cancer diagnostics: a systematic review of materials and biomarkers.Future science OA · 2025Review
- Extreme Tolerance of Nanoparticle-Protein Corona to Ultra-High Abundance Proteins Enhances the Depth of Serum Proteomics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Recent Advances and Clinical Approach to Cancer Treatment with Nanotechnology Derived Biomolecule.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025Review
- Nano-omics: nanotechnology-based multidimensional harvesting of the blood-circulating cancerome.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Applications of Proteomics in Ovarian Cancer: Dawn of a New Era.Proteomes · 2022Review
- Nanoproteomic Approach for Isolation and Identification of Potential Biomarkers in Human Urine from Adults with Normal Weight, Overweight and Obesity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Shotgun proteomics coupled to nanoparticle-based biomarker enrichment reveals a novel panel of extracellular matrix proteins as candidate serum protein biomarkers for early-stage breast cancer detection.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2020Observational
- Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy - A Mini-Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Review
- Contribution of the plasma and lymph Degradome and Peptidome to the MHC Ligandome.Immunogenetics · 2019Review
- Charged poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) nanogels for use as differential protein receptors in a turbidimetric sensor array.The Analyst · 2017Article
- Article
- Proteomics and peptidomics: moving toward precision medicine in urological malignancies.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- Current state of the art for enhancing urine biomarker discovery.Expert review of proteomics · 2016Review
- Proteomics of ovarian cancer: functional insights and clinical applications.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2015Review
- Accessing to the minor proteome of red blood cells through the influence of the nanoparticle surface properties on the corona composition.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015Article
- Hydrogel nanoparticle harvesting of plasma or urine for detecting low abundance proteins.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- The use of Nanotrap particles for biodefense and emerging infectious disease diagnostics.Pathogens and disease · 2014Review
- Deciphering the ovarian cancer ascites fluid peptidome.Clinical proteomics · 2014Article
- The use of Nanotrap particles technology in capturing HIV-1 virions and viral proteins from infected cells.PloS one · 2014Article
- Deciphering the peptidome of urine from ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls.Clinical proteomics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current efforts to identify protein biomarkers of disease use mainly mass spectrometry (MS) to analyze tissue and blood specimens. The low-molecular-weight "peptidome" is an attractive information archive because of the facile nature by which the low-molecular-weight information freely crosses the endothelial cell barrier of the vasculature, which provides opportunity to measure disease microenvironment-associated protein analytes secreted or shed into the extracellular interstitium and from there into the circulation. However, identifying useful protein biomarkers (peptidomic or not) which could be useful to detect early detection/monitoring of disease, toxicity, doping, or drug abuse has been severely hampered because even the most sophisticated, high-resolution MS technologies have lower sensitivities than those of the immunoassays technologies now routinely used in clinical practice. Identification of novel low abundance biomarkers that are indicative of early-stage events that likely exist in the sub-nanogram per milliliter concentration range of known markers, such as prostate-specific antigen, cannot be readily detected by current MS technologies. We have developed a new nanoparticle technology that can, in one step, capture, concentrate, and separate the peptidome from high-abundance blood proteins. Herein, we describe an initial pilot study whereby the peptidome content of ovarian and prostate cancer patients is investigated with this method. Differentially abundant candidate peptidome biomarkers that appear to be specific for early-stage ovarian and prostate cancer have been identified and reveal the potential utility for this new methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.