ArticleFamilial cancer2010
Can a phenotype for recessive inheritance in breast cancer be defined?
Article in Familial cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Worse breast cancer prognosis of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers: what's the evidence? A systematic review with meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Etiology of familial breast cancer with undetected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: clinical implications.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2014Review
- Autoimmune diseases and hypersensitivities improve the prognosis in ER-negative breast cancer.SpringerPlus · 2013Article
- Breast cancer patients with lobular cancer more commonly have a father than a mother diagnosed with cancer.BMC cancer · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While a dominant inheritance of breast cancer (vertical inheritance) is well known, less is known about a possible recessive inheritance (horizontal inheritance). In a clinical series of 1676 breast cancer patient's family history was scored as vertical (grandmother-aunt-mother-sister-daughter) or horizontal (sister-sister) and related to histopathological tumor type, presence of germline mutations, bilaterality, multifocality, screening, parity, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use and age at diagnosis. Prognosis was estimated by also adding tumor size, lymph node status, distant metastases and hormone receptor status at diagnosis into a Cox proportional hazard model. Excluding mutations carriers, a horizontal family history (5% of all cases) was significantly associated with tubular tumor type [OR = 3.87(1.44-10.41)]. A vertical family history (23% of all cases) was significantly related to tumor multifocality [OR = 2.30(1.51-3.50)], tumor bilaterality [OR = 2.08(1.44-3.00)] and screening detection [OR = 1.50(1.10-2.05)]. No significant difference in survival could be seen between patients with none, horizontal or vertical family history. However, germline mutation carriers (BRCA1/2, TP53 or CDKN2A, present in 0.95% of the cases) had a significantly worse survival. Screening detected cases, HRT ever users and patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors had a significantly better survival adjusting for age at diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node status and presence of distant metastases at diagnosis. Factors associated with a horizontal family history were found, defining a possible phenotype for a recessive inheritance: tubular breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20549370What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.