ArticlePediatric cardiology2010
Gentamicin dosing for pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacokinetic analysis of conventional tobramycin dosing for infants in the cardiac intensive care unit.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Chemical Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmias with Ibutilide in Children and Adults with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- Gentamicin Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dosage in Infant Patients: A Case Report and Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Implementation of a Pharmacist-Driven Vancomycin and Aminoglycoside Dosing Service in a Pediatric Hospital.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022Article
- Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates With and Without Congenital Heart Disease.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2021Article
- Comparison of Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Neonates Following Implementation of a New Dosage Protocol.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAGArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease can have physiologies that alter the pharmacokinetics of certain medications, such as aminoglycosides. Currently, no literature describes the appropriate dosing of aminoglycoside antibiotics for infants and children with congenital heart disease. Patients were identified through the pharmacy and laboratory computer systems. Patients were included in the study if they were younger than 18 years, received gentamicin on the acute-care (nonintensive care) cardiology floor at the authors' institution, had structural congenital heart disease, and had a peak and trough level obtained at about the third dose or later. Cohort achievement of therapeutic peak and trough concentrations based on standard dosing guidelines was evaluated. The inclusion criteria were met by 48 patients (31 boys). Eight patients (17%) had baseline cyanosis. Cardiac surgery was performed for 23 patients (48%) during the same admission at which aminoglycoside therapy was initiated. A total of 27 patients (56%) received at least one other nephrotoxic medication at the time of aminoglycoside therapy. Six patients had undetectable serum trough levels. A therapeutic peak concentration was not achieved by 16.7% of the cohort, and 7.1% of the cohort did not achieve a therapeutic trough concentration. Pediatric patients with congenital heart disease may require alterations in gentamicin dosing. Close pharmacokinetic monitoring of aminoglycoside therapy for these patients is warranted to ensure attainment of goal concentrations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.