Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20547770›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Influence of heparin mimetics on assembly of the FGF.FGFR4 signaling complex.

Krishna Saxena, Ulrich Schieborr, Oliver Anderka, Elke Duchardt-Ferner, Bettina Elshorst, Santosh Lakshmi Gande, Julia Janzon, Denis Kudlinzki, Sridhar Sreeramulu, Matthias K Dreyer and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proteoglycan sequence.Molecular bioSystems · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Krishna SaxenaInstitute for Organic Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ulrich Schieborr
Oliver Anderka
Elke Duchardt-Ferner
Bettina Elshorst
Santosh Lakshmi Gande
Julia Janzon
Denis Kudlinzki
Sridhar Sreeramulu
Matthias K Dreyer
K Ulrich Wendt
Corentin Herbert
Philippe Duchaussoy
Marc Bianciotto
Pierre-Alexandre Driguez
Gilbert Lassalle
Pierre Savi
Moosa Mohammadi
Françoise Bono
Harald Schwalbe
Goethe University Frankfurt · DESanofi (France) · FRFrankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies · DENew York University · USSanofi (Germany) · DE

Funding

MECHANISMS OF FGF RECEPTOR REGULATION AND SIGNALINGR01DE013686 · NIDCR · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MOHAMMADI, MOOSA · 2000 to 2020
$12.3M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling regulates mammalian development and metabolism, and its dysregulation is implicated in many inherited and acquired diseases, including cancer. Heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (HSGAGs) are essential for FGF signaling as they promote FGF.FGF receptor (FGFR) binding and dimerization. Using novel organic synthesis protocols to prepare homogeneously sulfated heparin mimetics (HM), including hexasaccharide (HM(6)), octasaccharide (HM(8)), and decasaccharide (HM(10)), we tested the ability of these HM to support FGF1 and FGF2 signaling through FGFR4. Biological assays show that both HM(8) and HM(10) are significantly more potent than HM(6) in promoting FGF2-mediated FGFR4 signaling. In contrast, all three HM have comparable activity in promoting FGF1.FGFR4 signaling. To understand the molecular basis for these differential activities in FGF1/2.FGFR4 signaling, we used NMR spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and size-exclusion chromatography to characterize binding interactions of FGF1/2 with the isolated Ig-domain 2 (D2) of FGFR4 in the presence of HM, and binary interactions of FGFs and D2 with HM. Our data confirm the existence of both a secondary FGF1.FGFR4 interaction site and a direct FGFR4.FGFR4 interaction site thus supporting the formation of the symmetric mode of FGF.FGFR dimerization in solution. Moreover, our results show that the observed higher activity of HM(8) relative to HM(6) in stimulating FGF2.FGFR4 signaling correlates with the higher affinity of HM(8) to bind and dimerize FGF2. Notably FGF2.HM(8) exhibits pronounced positive binding cooperativity. Based on our findings we propose a refined symmetric FGF.FGFR dimerization model, which incorporates the differential ability of HM to dimerize FGFs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesCell LineFibroblast Growth FactorsHeparinHumansMiceMultiprotein ComplexesOligosaccharidesProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4Structure-Activity RelationshipFGFR4 protein, humanFibroblast Growth FactorsHeparinMultiprotein ComplexesOligosaccharidesReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 4

Identifiers

PMID20547770
PMCPMC2924102
OpenAlexW2067825732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.