Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20545393›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2010

One-trial cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats: role of contextual stimuli.

Matthew S Herbert, Taleen Der-Ghazarian, Alexandria G Palmer, Sanders A McDougall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew S HerbertDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA.
Taleen Der-Ghazarian
Alexandria G Palmer
Sanders A McDougall

Funding

Ontogeny of behavioral sensitization: associative and nonassociative processesSC1DA027985 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI MCDOUGALL, SANDERS · 2009 to 2012
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA027985NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA027985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a one-trial procedure, preweanling rats exhibit robust sensitization regardless of whether drug pretreatment and testing occur in the same or different environments. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether one-trial context-specific and context-independent sensitization of preweanling rats could be dissociated by varying the pretreatment dose of cocaine, by varying the pretreatment drug, or by minimizing interoceptive cues. In Experiments 1a and 1b, rats were pretreated with a broad dose range of cocaine (0-40 mg/kg) before placement in a novel activity chamber or the home cage. In Experiment 2, rats were pretreated with a locomotor-enhancing drug (e.g., methylphenidate, U50,488, or MK-801) before placement in a novel activity or anesthesia chamber. In Experiment 3, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane before cocaine administration to minimize the effects of interoceptive and injection cues. In all experiments, rats were challenged with cocaine on the test day (24 hr later), with locomotion being measured in activity chambers. Results showed that (a) the pretreatment dose of cocaine (10-40 mg/kg) did not differentially affect context-specific and context-independent sensitization; (b) cross-sensitization between methylphenidate and cocaine was observed in the context-specific condition, but not when using a context-independent procedure; and (c) sensitization was evident if injection and interoceptive cues were minimized. One possibility is that associative processes do not modulate the one-trial sensitization of preweanling rats. Alternatively, "unitization" may cause preweanling rats to treat the different environments as equivalent, thus permitting robust sensitization even when drug pretreatment and testing occur in different environments.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBehavior, AnimalCocaineConditioning, Operant3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-IsomerAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCentral Nervous System StimulantsDizocilpine MaleateDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleLocomotionMale3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-IsomerAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, LocalCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDizocilpine MaleateMethylphenidateNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID20545393
PMCPMC2896227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.