Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20544957›Full record

ArticleProteins2010

FoldGPCR: structure prediction protocol for the transmembrane domain of G protein-coupled receptors from class A.

Mayako Michino, Jianhan Chen, Raymond C Stevens, Charles L Brooks

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteins, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. OMPcontact: An Outer Membrane Protein Inter-Barrel Residue Contact Prediction Method.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2017
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mayako MichinoDepartment of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Jianhan Chen
Raymond C Stevens
Charles L Brooks
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEKansas State University · USScripps Research Institute · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

WEB BASED DOCUMENTATION &TUTORIALS FOR YAMMPP41RR012255 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BROOKS, CHARLES L · 1997 to 2009
$10.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR012255NCRR NIH HHS RR012255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building reliable structural models of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a difficult task because of the paucity of suitable templates, low sequence identity, and the wide variety of ligand specificities within the superfamily. Template-based modeling is known to be the most successful method for protein structure prediction. However, refinement of homology models within 1-3 A C alpha RMSD of the native structure remains a major challenge. Here, we address this problem by developing a novel protocol (foldGPCR) for modeling the transmembrane (TM) region of GPCRs in complex with a ligand, aimed to accurately model the structural divergence between the template and target in the TM helices. The protocol is based on predicted conserved inter-residue contacts between the template and target, and exploits an all-atom implicit membrane force field. The placement of the ligand in the binding pocket is guided by biochemical data. The foldGPCR protocol is implemented by a stepwise hierarchical approach, in which the TM helical bundle and the ligand are assembled by simulated annealing trials in the first step, and the receptor-ligand complex is refined with replica exchange sampling in the second step. The protocol is applied to model the human beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) bound to carazolol, using contacts derived from the template structure of bovine rhodopsin. Comparison with the X-ray crystal structure of the beta(2)AR shows that our protocol is particularly successful in accurately capturing helix backbone irregularities and helix-helix packing interactions that distinguish rhodopsin from beta(2)AR.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyExpert SystemsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAnimalsBinding SitesCattleComputer SimulationHumansLigandsMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularPropanolaminesProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AntagonistsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistscarazololLigandsMembrane ProteinsPropanolaminesReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID20544957
PMCPMC2933064
OpenAlexW1975264148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.