Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20544696›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews2010

Palate morphogenesis: current understanding and future directions.

Robert M Greene, M Michele Pisano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. mEpigenetics · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Alterations in DNA Methylation in Orofacial Clefts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Small-molecule Wnt agonists correct cleft palates inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert M GreeneDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Craniofacial Biology, University of Louisville, Birth Defects Center, ULSD, Louisville, Kentucky 40292, USA. dr.bob.greene@gmail.com
M Michele Pisano

Funding

U-SHAPED DEVELOPMENT IN INFANT COGNITION AND PERCEPTIONP20RR017702 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI PISANO, M. MICHELE · 2002 to 2011
$15.0M
Transcriptional Coactivators and Pregnancy OutcomesR01HD053509 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GREENE, ROBERT M · 2008 to 2012
$1.5M
NUTRITIONAL EPIGENETICS AND OROFACIAL DEVELOPMENTR01DE018215 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GREENE, ROBERT M · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION DURING CRANIOFACIAL EMBRYOGENESISR01DE005550 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI GREENE, ROBERT M · 1985 to 2004
$907k
Developmental Cigarette Smoke Exposure: Biomarkers of NeurotoxicityR21DA027466 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI NEAL, RACHEL ELIZABETH, PISANO, M. MICHELE · 2009 to 2011
$583k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017702NICHD NIH HHS HD053509NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053509NIDA NIH HHS DA027466NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA027466NIDCR NIH HHS DE018215NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE005550NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past, most scientists conducted their inquiries of nature via inductivism, the patient accumulation of "pieces of information" in the pious hope that the sum of the parts would clarify the whole. Increasingly, modern biology employs the tools of bioinformatics and systems biology in attempts to reveal the "big picture." Most successful laboratories engaged in the pursuit of the secrets of embryonic development, particularly those whose research focus is craniofacial development, pursue a middle road where research efforts embrace, rather than abandon, what some have called the "pedestrian" qualities of inductivism, while increasingly employing modern data mining technologies. The secondary palate has provided an excellent paradigm that has enabled examination of a wide variety of developmental processes. Examination of cellular signal transduction, as it directs embryogenesis, has proven exceptionally revealing with regard to clarification of the "facts" of palatal ontogeny-at least the facts as we currently understand them. Herein, we review the most basic fundamentals of orofacial embryology and discuss how functioning of TGFbeta, BMP, Shh, and Wnt signal transduction pathways contributes to palatal morphogenesis. Our current understanding of palate medial edge epithelial differentiation is also examined. We conclude with a discussion of how the rapidly expanding field of epigenetics, particularly regulation of gene expression by miRNAs and DNA methylation, is critical to control of cell and tissue differentiation, and how examination of these epigenetic processes has already begun to provide a better understanding of, and greater appreciation for, the complexities of palatal morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Bone Morphogenetic ProteinsData MiningEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleHedgehog ProteinsHumansMorphogenesisPalatePregnancySignal TransductionTransforming Growth Factor betaBone Morphogenetic ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsSHH protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID20544696
PMCPMC3138490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.