ArticleNeuroscience and behavioral physiology2010
Reversible and irreversible stages in the development of amnesia after disruption of the reactivation of associative memory in snails.
Article in Neuroscience and behavioral physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcription inhibitors prevent amnesia induced by NMDA antagonist-mediated impairment of memory reconsolidation.Learning & behavior · 2016Article
- Preclinical non-human models to combat dementia.Annals of neurosciences · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our previous studies on common snails have demonstrated that inhibition of NMDA glutamate receptors during reactivation of a skill consisting of refusal of a defined foodstuff leads to impairment of long-term memory. We report here our studies of the dynamics of the development of amnesia. Snails were trained to refuse a defined foodstuff and were injected 24 h later with the NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801, and were then presented with the conditioned food stimulus (a reminder). Testing on days 1 and 3 after exposure to MK-801 and the reminder showed gradual decreases in the number of refusals of the conditioned food stimulus. Repeat training of the animals to refuse the same foodstuff performed during these periods led to restoration of the skill seen after the initial training. The number of refusals by snails of the conditioned food stimulus 10 days after MK-801 and the reminder decreased to a minimal level. Repeat training at this time did not lead to the formation of a conditioned reflex to food. Thus, we have provided the first demonstration that impairment of the reactivation of long-term memory induces two stages in the development of amnesia. The first, reversible, stage, which lasted less than 10 days, was characterized by the potential for long-term memory to be restored by repeat training of the snails. The second, irreversible, stage developed 10 days after induction of amnesia and was characterized by disruption of the ability of long-term memory to be restored. These results may have practical value in terms of understanding the mechanisms of acute memory loss due to trauma and neurological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20544391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.