ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2010
Differential regulation of calcium-activated potassium channels by dynamic intracellular calcium signals.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypotonicity-induced TRPV4 function in renal collecting duct cells: modulation by progressive cross-talk with Ca2+-activated K+ channels.Cell calcium · 2012Article
- Stochastic amplification of calcium-activated potassium currents in Ca2+ microdomains.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calcium (Ca(2+))-activated K(+) (K(Ca)) channels regulate membrane excitability and are activated by an increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)), leading to membrane hyperpolarization. Most patch clamp experiments that measure K(Ca) currents use steady-state [Ca(2+)] buffered within the patch pipette. However, when cells are stimulated physiologically, [Ca(2+)](i) changes dynamically, for example during [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the effect of dynamic changes in [Ca(2+)](i) on small (SK3), intermediate (hIK1), and large conductance (BK) channels. HEK293 cells stably expressing each K(Ca) subtype in isolation were used to simultaneously measure agonist-evoked [Ca(2+)](i) signals, using indo-1 fluorescence, and current/voltage, using perforated patch clamp. Agonist-evoked [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations induced a corresponding K(Ca) current that faithfully followed the [Ca(2+)](i) in 13-50% of cells, suggesting a good synchronization. However, [Ca(2+)](i) and K(Ca) current was much less synchronized in 50-76% of cells that exhibited Ca(2+)-independent current events (55% of SK3-, 50% of hIK1-, and 53% of BK-expressing cells) and current-independent [Ca(2+)](i) events (18% SK3- and 33% of BK-expressing cells). Moreover, in BK-expressing cells, where [Ca(2+)](i) and K(Ca) current was least synchronized, 36% of total [Ca(2+)](i) spikes occurred without activating a corresponding K(Ca) current spike, suggesting that BK(Ca) channels were either inhibited or had become desensitized. This desynchronization between dynamic [Ca(2+)](i) and K(Ca) current suggests that this relationship is more complex than could be predicted from steady-state [Ca(2+)](i) and K(Ca) current. These phenomena may be important for encoding stimulus-response coupling in various cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20544344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.