ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2010
Integrated preventive care coverage effectiveness in high-risk worksites in Mexico.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Moral issues in workplace health promotion.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2012Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWorksites have been considered a propitious environment for promoting health. In 2005, an integrated preventive care (IPC) system was implemented in Mexico consisting of health promotion and disease prevention interrelated activities, delivered on a single visit and on location. This project contributes relevant information on IPC coverage and its degree of effectiveness on providing health promotion services to workers at high-risk worksites.
methodsThere were included 68 worksites particularly affected by high fatal and nonfatal injury rates; the target population comprised 45,724 workers. Coverage referred to the completion of IPC actions within the last year, and effectiveness was defined as the extent to which an observed IPC coverage came close to an ideal IPC coverage. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for given estimates. RESULTS AND
conclusionsOverall IPC mean coverage effectiveness was 61.2% (95% CI 60.8-61.6), a value below satisfactory range limits. Results broken down by sex and age showed higher mean coverage effectiveness for adult working men than adult working women (p < 0.0001). Promotion of reproductive health was the IPC process with the lowest mean coverage effectiveness (51.8%; 95% CI 50.8-52.7), followed by the disease detection process (59.0%; 95% CI 58.4-59.6) and the disease prevention and control process (61.0%; 95% CI 60.5-61.5). Maintaining the health of the workforce poses a significant challenge for health services. Therefore, analysis of coverage effectiveness represents a useful tool for evaluating and reorganizing preventive medicine care at worksites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.