Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20544214›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2010

Bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols: survey and future perspectives in Europe.

Santo Davide Ferrara, Thomas Bajanowski, Rossana Cecchi, Rossella Snenghi, Colette Case, Guido Viel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The role of histopathology in forensic practice: an overview.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2014
    Review
  11. Medical malpractice and legal medicine.International journal of legal medicine · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe.International journal of legal medicine · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unitariness, evidence and quality in bio-medicolegal sciences.International journal of legal medicine · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Santo Davide FerraraDepartment of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Legal Medicine, University-Hospital of Padua, Via Falloppio, 50, 35121 Padua, Italy. santodavide.ferrara@unipd.it
Thomas Bajanowski
Rossana Cecchi
Rossella Snenghi
Colette Case
Guido Viel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preservation of uniqueness and the enhancement of the value of evidence in legal medicine is based on the implementation and development of a "quality management system," which includes a continuous education of specialists, the introduction and application of guidelines and protocols, as well as mechanisms of internal quality control. This ongoing process shows differences with regard to various fields of knowledge such as forensic genetics, toxicology, forensic pathology or forensic psychiatry, especially if different European countries are compared. To get an overview on the development of legal medicine in different European countries, a questionnaire was developed and sent to representatives of 42 European countries to verify the existence of bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols. A National Society of Legal Medicine is established in 27 out of 32 countries (84%) which could be included in the final analyses. In 25 countries (78%), a specialisation is necessary as a prerequisite of inclusion in a national register, and 30 of the countries (94%) have guidelines in at least one field of legal medicine. The most common guidelines concern forensic pathology (in the fields of professional qualification and sudden death), forensic toxicology (driving under the influence of drugs and substance testing) and forensic genetics (paternity testing and personal identification). The findings of this study show that comparison is possible and can be a basis for further consensus in the European medicolegal community. The process of harmonisation of the medicolegal autopsy rules in Europe initiated in 1990 was a first step on this way. Further consensus is necessary and might be gained by developing European guidelines for each field within the subdisciplines, based on a standard European Guideline Format.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicEuropeForensic MedicineHumansQuality ControlSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.