ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2010
Bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols: survey and future perspectives in Europe.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Padova Charter on personal injury and damage under civil-tort law : Medico-legal guidelines on methods of ascertainment and criteria of evaluation.International journal of legal medicine · 2016Guideline
- Malpractice and medical liability. European Guidelines on Methods of Ascertainment and Criteria of Evaluation.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Guideline
- Ethyl glucuronide concentration in hair for detecting heavy drinking and/or abstinence: a meta-analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Phosphatidylethanol in blood as a marker of chronic alcohol use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2012Pooled it
- From Deutsche Zeitschrift to International journal of legal medicine-100 years of legal medicine through the lens of journal articles, Part 4: International journal of legal medicine from 1990 to 2022.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Risk or Contributory Death Factors in Methadone-Related Fatalities: A Review and Pooled Analysis.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Article
- Back to the Future - Part 2. Post-mortem assessment and evolutionary role of the bio-medicolegal sciences.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Review
- Back to the Future - Part 1. The medico-legal autopsy from ancient civilization to the post-genomic era.International journal of legal medicine · 2017Review
- The role of histopathology in forensic practice: an overview.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2014Review
- Medical malpractice and legal medicine.International journal of legal medicine · 2013Article
- Severe generalised rhabdomyolysis with fatal outcome associated with isotretinoin.International journal of legal medicine · 2012Article
- Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe.International journal of legal medicine · 2012Article
- Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe. A country-based analysis.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
- Bio-medicolegal scientific research in Europe: a comprehensive bibliometric overview.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
- Unitariness, evidence and quality in bio-medicolegal sciences.International journal of legal medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The preservation of uniqueness and the enhancement of the value of evidence in legal medicine is based on the implementation and development of a "quality management system," which includes a continuous education of specialists, the introduction and application of guidelines and protocols, as well as mechanisms of internal quality control. This ongoing process shows differences with regard to various fields of knowledge such as forensic genetics, toxicology, forensic pathology or forensic psychiatry, especially if different European countries are compared. To get an overview on the development of legal medicine in different European countries, a questionnaire was developed and sent to representatives of 42 European countries to verify the existence of bio-medicolegal guidelines and protocols. A National Society of Legal Medicine is established in 27 out of 32 countries (84%) which could be included in the final analyses. In 25 countries (78%), a specialisation is necessary as a prerequisite of inclusion in a national register, and 30 of the countries (94%) have guidelines in at least one field of legal medicine. The most common guidelines concern forensic pathology (in the fields of professional qualification and sudden death), forensic toxicology (driving under the influence of drugs and substance testing) and forensic genetics (paternity testing and personal identification). The findings of this study show that comparison is possible and can be a basis for further consensus in the European medicolegal community. The process of harmonisation of the medicolegal autopsy rules in Europe initiated in 1990 was a first step on this way. Further consensus is necessary and might be gained by developing European guidelines for each field within the subdisciplines, based on a standard European Guideline Format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20544214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.