ArticleMolecular bioSystems2010
Intrinsic disorder and protein multibinding in domain, terminal, and linker regions.
Article in Molecular bioSystems, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrinsic Disorder in Proteins with Pathogenic Repeat Expansions.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Anatomy of protein disorder, flexibility and disease-related mutations.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015Article
- Protein flexibility in the light of structural alphabets.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015Review
- Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Review
- Specialized Dynamical Properties of Promiscuous Residues Revealed by Simulated Conformational Ensembles.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2013Article
- Regulation of protein-protein binding by coupling between phosphorylation and intrinsic disorder: analysis of human protein complexes.Molecular bioSystems · 2013Article
- Predicting the binding patterns of hub proteins: a study using yeast protein interaction networks.PloS one · 2013Article
- Human cyclin-dependent kinase 2-associated protein 1 (CDK2AP1) is dimeric in its disulfide-reduced state, with natively disordered N-terminal region.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
- Intrinsic protein disorder in human pathways.Molecular bioSystems · 2012Article
- HomPPI: a class of sequence homology based protein-protein interface prediction methods.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Differential occurrence of protein intrinsic disorder in the cytoplasmic signaling domains of cell receptors.Self/nonself · 2011Article
- The challenge of ORF1p phosphorylation: Effects on L1 activity and its host.Mobile genetic elementsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsic disorder is believed to contribute to the ability of some proteins to interact with multiple partners which is important for protein functional promiscuity and regulation of the cross-talk between pathways. To better understand the mechanisms of molecular recognition through disordered regions, here, we systematically investigate the coupling between disorder and binding within domain families in a structure interaction network and in terminal and inter-domain linker regions. We showed that the canonical domain-domain interaction model should take into account contributions of N- and C-termini and inter-domain linkers, which may form all or part of the binding interfaces. For the majority of proteins, binding interfaces on domain and terminal regions were predicted to be less disordered than non-interface regions. Analysis of all domain families revealed several exceptions, such as kinases, DNA/RNA binding proteins, certain enzymes, and regulatory proteins, which are candidates for disorder-to-order transitions that can occur upon binding. Domain interfaces that bind single or multiple partners do not exhibit significant difference in disorder content if normalized by the number of interactions. In general, protein families with more diverse interactions exhibit less average disorder over all members of the family. Our results shed light on recent controversies regarding the relationship between disorder and binding of multiple partners at common interfaces. In particular, they support the hypothesis that protein domains with many interacting partners should have a pleiotropic effect on functional pathways and consequently might be more constrained in evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.