Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20543980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Rapamycin pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships in osteosarcoma: a comparative oncology study in dogs.

Melissa C Paoloni, Christina Mazcko, Elizabeth Fox, Timothy Fan, Susan Lana, William Kisseberth, David M Vail, Kaylee Nuckolls, Tanasa Osborne, Samuel Yalkowsy and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Histotripsy Ablation in Preclinical Animal Models of Cancer and Spontaneous Tumors in Veterinary Patients: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent and current clinical trials in canine appendicular osteosarcoma.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa C PaoloniComparative Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Christina Mazcko
Elizabeth Fox
Timothy Fan
Susan Lana
William Kisseberth
David M Vail
Kaylee Nuckolls
Tanasa Osborne
Samuel Yalkowsy
Daniel Gustafson
Yunkai Yu
Liang Cao
Chand Khanna
Center for Cancer Research · USColorado State University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USNational Cancer Institute · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Illinois System · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science Program (TL1)UL1RR025755 · NCRR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2008 to 2011
$26.3M
Design, Develop, Validate, and Implement Biomarkers for Clinical InvestigationsZICBC010981 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HESELMEYER, KERSTIN · 2009 to 2025
$11.7M
Comparative Oncology ProgramZIGBC010569 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KHANNA, CHAND · 2009 to 2014
$2.0M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignaling through the mTOR pathway contributes to growth, progression and chemoresistance of several cancers. Accordingly, inhibitors have been developed as potentially valuable therapeutics. Their optimal development requires consideration of dose, regimen, biomarkers and a rationale for their use in combination with other agents. Using the infrastructure of the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium many of these complex questions were asked within a relevant population of dogs with osteosarcoma to inform the development of mTOR inhibitors for future use in pediatric osteosarcoma patients. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis prospective dose escalation study of a parenteral formulation of rapamycin sought to define a safe, pharmacokinetically relevant, and pharmacodynamically active dose of rapamycin in dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma. Dogs entered into dose cohorts consisting of 3 dogs/cohort. Dogs underwent a pre-treatment tumor biopsy and collection of baseline PBMC. Dogs received a single intramuscular dose of rapamycin and underwent 48-hour whole blood pharmacokinetic sampling. Additionally, daily intramuscular doses of rapamycin were administered for 7 days with blood rapamycin trough levels collected on Day 8, 9 and 15. At Day 8 post-treatment collection of tumor and PBMC were obtained. No maximally tolerated dose of rapamycin was attained through escalation to the maximal planned dose of 0.08 mg/kg (2.5 mg/30 kg dog). Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a dose-dependent exposure. In all cohorts modulation of the mTOR pathway in tumor and PBMC (pS6RP/S6RP) was demonstrated. No change in pAKT/AKT was seen in tumor samples following rapamycin therapy. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Rapamycin may be safely administered to dogs and can yield therapeutic exposures. Modulation pS6RP/S6RP in tumor tissue and PBMCs was not dependent on dose. Results from this study confirm that the dog may be included in the translational development of rapamycin and potentially other mTOR inhibitors. Ongoing studies of rapamycin in dogs will define optimal schedules for their use in cancer and evaluate the role of rapamycin use in the setting of minimal residual disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCohort StudiesDog DiseasesDogsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleImmunosuppressive AgentsInjections, IntramuscularMaleOsteosarcomaSirolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID20543980
PMCPMC2882366
OpenAlexW2037002623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.