Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20543902›Full record

ArticleStatistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics2009

Analysis of Case-Control Association Studies: SNPs, Imputation and Haplotypes.

Nilanjan Chatterjee, Yi-Hau Chen, Sheng Luo, Raymond J Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nilanjan ChatterjeeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS. Rockville MD 20852, U.S.A.
Yi-Hau Chen
Sheng Luo
Raymond J Carroll

Funding

Measurement Error, Nutrition and Breast/Colon CancerR37CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
Measurement Error, Nutrition, Physical Activity and CancerU01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
MEASUREMENT ERROR, NUTRITION AND BREAST/COLON CANCERR01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 1992 to 2004
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057030NCI NIH HHS R37 CA057030NCI NIH HHS U01 CA057030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although prospective logistic regression is the standard method of analysis for case-control data, it has been recently noted that in genetic epidemiologic studies one can use the "retrospective" likelihood to gain major power by incorporating various population genetics model assumptions such as Hardy-Weinberg-Equilibrium (HWE), gene-gene and gene-environment independence. In this article, we review these modern methods and contrast them with the more classical approaches through two types of applications (i) association tests for typed and untyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and (ii) estimation of haplotype effects and haplotype-environment interactions in the presence of haplotype-phase ambiguity. We provide novel insights to existing methods by construction of various score-tests and pseudo-likelihoods. In addition, we describe a novel two-stage method for analysis of untyped SNPs that can use any flexible external algorithm for genotype imputation followed by a powerful association test based on the retrospective likelihood. We illustrate applications of the methods using simulated and real data.

Identifiers

PMID20543902
PMCPMC2883271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.