Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20543040›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Occurrence and molecular characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in an academic veterinary hospital.

Kanako Ishihara, Natsumi Shimokubo, Akie Sakagami, Hiroshi Ueno, Yasukazu Muramatsu, Tsuyoshi Kadosawa, Chie Yanagisawa, Hideaki Hanaki, Chie Nakajima, Yasuhiko Suzuki and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of Oxacillin-Resistant and Oxacillin-SusceptibleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pet animals as reservoirs for spreading methicillin-resistantJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial resistance inVeterinary world · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Control of Methicillin-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kanako IshiharaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Rakuno Gakuen University, 582 Midorimachi Bunkyodai Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan.
Natsumi Shimokubo
Akie Sakagami
Hiroshi Ueno
Yasukazu Muramatsu
Tsuyoshi Kadosawa
Chie Yanagisawa
Hideaki Hanaki
Chie Nakajima
Yasuhiko Suzuki
Yutaka Tamura
Rakuno Gakuen University · JPHokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) have been increasingly isolated from veterinarians and companion animals. With a view to preventing the spread of MRSA and MRSP, we evaluated the occurrence and molecular characteristics of each in a veterinary college. MRSA and MRSP were isolated from nasal samples from veterinarians, staff members, and veterinary students affiliated with a veterinary hospital. Using stepwise logistic regression, we identified two factors associated with MRSA carriage: (i) contact with an identified animal MRSA case (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.2 to 21.6) and (ii) being an employee (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 2.0 to 19.4). The majority of MRSA isolates obtained from individuals affiliated with the veterinary hospital and dog patients harbored spa type t002 and a type II staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), similar to the hospital-acquired MRSA isolates in Japan. MRSA isolates harboring spa type t008 and a type IV SCCmec were obtained from one veterinarian on three different sampling occasions and also from dog patients. MRSA carriers can also be a source of MRSA infection in animals. The majority of MRSP isolates (85.2%) carried hybrid SCCmec type II-III, and almost all the remaining MRSP isolates (11.1%) carried SCCmec type V. MRSA and MRSP were also isolated from environmental samples collected from the veterinary hospital (5.1% and 6.4%, respectively). The application of certain disinfection procedures is important for the prevention of nosocomial infection, and MRSA and MRSP infection control strategies should be adopted in veterinary medical practice.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceAnimalsBacterial Typing TechniquesCarrier StateDisease Transmission, InfectiousDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDogsEnvironmental MicrobiologyHospitals, AnimalHumansInfection ControlJapanMolecular EpidemiologyNoseStaphylococcal InfectionsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20543040
PMCPMC2916498
OpenAlexW2147573139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.