Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20541661›Full record

ArticleProgress in brain research2010

Menopause and mitochondria: windows into estrogen effects on Alzheimer's disease risk and therapy.

Victor W Henderson, Roberta Diaz Brinton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in brain research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
44.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Sex differences in brain glucose metabolism and Alzheimer's disease risk and progression.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Organelle-Targeting Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Aging: All roads lead to mitochondria.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Antidementia Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microvascular Alterations in Alzheimer's Disease.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor W HendersonDepartment of Health Research & Policy (Epidemiology), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. vhenderson@stanford.edu
Roberta Diaz Brinton
Stanford University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Biologic Response of Menopausal Women to 17B-EstradiolR01AG024154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HODIS, HOWARD NEIL · 2004 to 2012
$13.8M
Estrogen-Induced Neuroprotective Mitochondrial MechanismR01AG032236 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BRINTON, ROBERTA EILEEN · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG024154NIA NIH HHS R01 AG032236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolic derangements and oxidative stress are early events in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis. Multi-faceted effects of estrogens include improved cerebral metabolic profile and reduced oxidative stress through actions on mitochondria, suggesting that a woman's endogenous and exogenous estrogen exposures during midlife and in the late post-menopause might favourably influence Alzheimer risk and symptoms. This prediction finds partial support in the clinical literature. As expected, early menopause induced by oophorectomy may increase cognitive vulnerability; however, there is no clear link between age at menopause and Alzheimer risk in other settings, or between natural menopause and memory loss. Further, among older post-menopausal women, initiating estrogen-containing hormone therapy increases dementia risk and probably does not improve Alzheimer's disease symptoms. As suggested by the 'critical window' or 'healthy cell' hypothesis, better outcomes might be expected from earlier estrogen exposures. Some observational results imply that effects of hormone therapy on Alzheimer risk are indeed modified by age at initiation, temporal proximity to menopause, or a woman's health. However, potential methodological biases warrant caution in interpreting observational findings. Anticipated results from large, ongoing clinical trials [Early Versus Late Intervention Trial with Estradiol (ELITE), Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Study (KEEPS)] will help settle whether midlife estrogen therapy improves midlife cognitive skills but not whether midlife estrogen exposures modify late-life Alzheimer risk. Estrogen effects on mitochondria adumbrate the potential relevance of estrogens to Alzheimer's disease. However, laboratory models are inexact embodiments of Alzheimer pathogenesis and progression, making it difficult to surmise net effects of estrogen exposures. Research needs include better predictors of adverse cognitive outcomes, biomarkers for risks associated with hormone therapy, and tools for monitoring brain function and disease progression.

Indexed as

AgingAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleHumansMenopauseMitochondriaRiskEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID20541661
PMCPMC5776041
OpenAlexW158881778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.