ArticleHearing research2010
The remarkable cochlear amplifier.
Article in Hearing research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 92 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.
- An alternative pathway for delivery of power by outer hair cells to cochlear traveling waves.Hearing research · 2026Article
- Advances and prospects of 3D air-liquid interface cultured middle ear epithelial cells and inner ear organoids in otologic diseases.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Modulation of Cochlear Micromechanics Requires P2X4 Receptor in Outer Hair Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- TMEM145 is a key stereociliary component in the link structures of outer hair cells and mediates the secretion of stereocilin and tubby.Nature communications · 2025Article
- How Exceptional Is the Ear?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Rate-dependent cochlear outer hair cell force generation: Models and parameter estimation.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Fast Inhibition Slows and Desynchronizes Mouse Auditory Efferent Neuron Activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- On the interplay between speech perception and production: insights from research and theories.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- The Relevance of Autophagy within Inner Ear in Baseline Conditions and Tinnitus-Related Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The role of GABAFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- The auditory efferent system in mosquitoes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Overturning the mechanisms of cochlear amplification via area deformations of the organ of Corti.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex in the Low-Frequency Apical Region of the Gerbil Cochlea for Normal Hearing : Sound Induced Vibrations Deform the Organ of Corti Complex.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Prestin-Mediated Frequency Selectivity Does not Cover Ultrahigh Frequencies in Mice.Neuroscience bulletin · 2022Article
- Diverse identities and sites of action of cochlear neurotransmitters.Hearing research · 2022Review
- Vector of motion measurements in the living cochlea using a 3D OCT vibrometry system.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Link between stimulus otoacoustic emissions fine structure peaks and standing wave resonances in a cochlear model.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- The Relative and Combined Effects of Noise Exposure and Aging on Auditory Peripheral Neural Deafferentation: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Mammalian middle ear mechanics: A review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The Effect of Lifetime Noise Exposure and Aging on Speech-Perception-in-Noise Ability and Self-Reported Hearing Symptoms: An Online Study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedSacchi, J R Santos [corrected to Santos-Sacchi, J]
Authors and funding
17 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This composite article is intended to give the experts in the field of cochlear mechanics an opportunity to voice their personal opinion on the one mechanism they believe dominates cochlear amplification in mammals. A collection of these ideas are presented here for the auditory community and others interested in the cochlear amplifier. Each expert has given their own personal view on the topic and at the end of their commentary they have suggested several experiments that would be required for the decisive mechanism underlying the cochlear amplifier. These experiments are presently lacking but if successfully performed would have an enormous impact on our understanding of the cochlear amplifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.