Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20540792›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2010

Small molecule screening in zebrafish: an in vivo approach to identifying new chemical tools and drug leads.

Kerrie L Taylor, Nicola J Grant, Nicholas D Temperley, E Elizabeth Patton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Heterocyclic Compounds as Synthetic Tyrosinase Inhibitors: Recent Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Zebrafish Models of Cancer Therapy-Induced Cardiovascular Toxicity.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The effect of hyperglycemia on neurovascular coupling and cerebrovascular patterning in zebrafish.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Article
  19. Do Zebrafish Obey Lipinski Rules?ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kerrie L TaylorMRC Human Genetics Unit and the Division of Cancer Research, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK. e.patton@hgu.mrc.ac.uk.
Nicola J Grant
Nicholas D Temperley
E Elizabeth Patton

Funding

Medical Research Council G120/875Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127585840Medical Research Council MC_U127585840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, zebrafish genetic screens have identified a wealth of mutations that have been essential to the understanding of development and disease biology. More recently, chemical screens in zebrafish have identified small molecules that can modulate specific developmental and behavioural processes. Zebrafish are a unique vertebrate system in which to study chemical genetic systems, identify drug leads, and explore new applications for known drugs. Here, we discuss some of the advantages of using zebrafish in chemical biology, and describe some important and creative examples of small molecule screening, drug discovery and target identification.

Identifiers

PMID20540792
PMCPMC2912314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.