ArticleBMC medical education2010
Planning training seminars in palliative care: a cross-sectional survey on the preferences of general practitioners and nurses in Austria.
Article in BMC medical education, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Views of general practitioners on end-of-life care learning preferences: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2022Pooled it
- Palliative care training addressed to hospital healthcare professionals by palliative care specialists: a mixed-method evaluation.BMC palliative care · 2019Article
- [Palliative care in nursing homes : Results of a survey about knowledge and self-efficacy of nursing staff].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Advancing the pain management in older adults agenda forward through the development of key research and education priorities: A Canadian perspective.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2017Article
- Case management in primary palliative care is associated more strongly with organisational than with patient characteristics: results from a cross-sectional prospective study.BMC palliative care · 2015Article
- Article
- Characteristics of sudden unexpected cancer deaths investigated by medical examiners in Tokyo, Japan (2009).Journal of epidemiology · 2014Article
- Perspectives of Respiratory Physicians toward Need and Integration of Palliative Care in Advanced Respiratory Diseases.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Using Social Constructivist Learning Theory to Unpack General Practitioners' Learning Preferences of End-of-Life Care: A Systematically Constructed Narrative Review.Indian journal of palliative careReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraining in palliative care is frequently requested by health care professionals. However, little is known in detail about the subject matters and the educational preferences of physicians and staff or assistant nurses in this field.
methodsAll 897 registered GPs and all 933 registered home care nurses in the district of Steiermark/Austria were sent postal questionnaires.
resultsResults from 546 (30%) respondents revealed that GPs prefer evening courses and weekend seminars, whereas staff and assistant nurses prefer one-day courses. Multidisciplinary sessions are preferred by almost 80% of all professional groups. GPs preferred multi disciplinary groups most frequently when addressing psychosocial needs (88.8%) and ethical questions (85.8%). Staff and assistant nurses preferred multidisciplinary groups most frequently in the area of pain management (88%) and opted for multi disciplinary learning to a significantly higher extent than GPs (69%; p < 0.01). Those topics were ranked first which are not only deepening, but supplementing the professional training. On average, GPs were willing to spend a maximum amount of euro 400 per year for training seminars in palliative care, whereas nurses would spend approximately euro 190 for such classes.The results provide a detailed analysis of the preferences of GPs and nurses and offer guidance for the organisation of training seminars in palliative care.
conclusionsMedical and nursing education programs often pursue separate paths. Yet our findings indicate that in palliative care multidisciplinary training seminars are favoured by both, doctors and nurses. Also, both groups prefer topics that are not only deepening, but supplementing their professional knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.