Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20540747›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Reassociation kinetics-based approach for partial genome sequencing of the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.

Felix D Guerrero, Paula Moolhuijzen, Daniel G Peterson, Shelby Bidwell, Elisabet Caler, Matthew Bellgard, Vishvanath M Nene, Appolinaire Djikeng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Pacific BiosciencesData in brief · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Roadmap for Tick-Borne Flavivirus Research in the "Omics" Era.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Felix D GuerreroUSDA-ARS, Knipling-Bushland U,S, Livestock Insects Research Laboratory, 2700 Fredericksburg Rd,, Kerrville, TX 78028, USA. Felix.Guerrero@ars.usda.gov
Paula Moolhuijzen
Daniel G Peterson
Shelby Bidwell
Elisabet Caler
Matthew Bellgard
Vishvanath M Nene
Appolinaire Djikeng
International Livestock Research Institute · KEJ. Craig Venter Institute · USMurdoch University · AUAgricultural Research Service · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe size and repetitive nature of the Rhipicephalus microplus genome makes obtaining a full genome sequence fiscally and technically problematic. To selectively obtain gene-enriched regions of this tick's genome, Cot filtration was performed, and Cot-filtered DNA was sequenced via 454 FLX pyrosequencing.

resultsThe sequenced Cot-filtered genomic DNA was assembled with an EST-based gene index of 14,586 unique entries where each EST served as a potential "seed" for scaffold formation. The new sequence assembly extended the lengths of 3,913 of the 14,586 gene index entries. Over half of the extensions corresponded to extensions of over 30 amino acids. To survey the repetitive elements in the tick genome, the complete sequences of five BAC clones were determined. Both Class I and II transposable elements were found. Comparison of the BAC and Cot filtration data indicates that Cot filtration was highly successful in filtering repetitive DNA out of the genomic DNA used in 454 sequencing.

conclusionCot filtration is a very useful strategy to incorporate into genome sequencing projects on organisms with large genome sizes and which contain high percentages of repetitive, difficult to assemble, genomic DNA. Combining the Cot selection approach with 454 sequencing and assembly with a pre-existing EST database as seeds resulted in extensions of 27% of the members of the EST database.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCloning, MolecularDNA, ComplementaryGenomeGenomicsKineticsNucleic Acid HybridizationRhipicephalusSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID20540747
PMCPMC2893602
OpenAlexW2123752411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.