Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20539322›Full record

Trial reportCancer gene therapy2010

Role of cell surface molecules and autologous ascitic fluid in determining efficiency of adenoviral transduction of ovarian cancer cells.

N Ingram, L P MacCormac, N T Oxley, P A Burns, G D Hall

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer gene therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N IngramDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Research UK Clinical Centre in Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK. n.ingram@leeds.ac.uk
L P MacCormac
N T Oxley
P A Burns
G D Hall
Cancer Research UK · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenovirus is the most frequently used virus in gene therapy clinical trials. There have been conflicting reports on the ability of adenovirus to transduce primary ovarian cancer samples and the expression of relevant cell surface molecules. These factors were examined using primary ovarian cancer cells cultured from ascites and solid tumor to gain insights into the clinical use of adenovirus in ovarian cancer. The level of transduction of primary cultures was much higher than uncultured cells and established cell lines, and correlated with higher levels of coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) and integrin expression. Growth of primary cultures in autologous ascitic fluid prevented an increase in CAR expression and inhibited transduction compared with cells treated in supplemented RPMI. Cells at the periphery of solid tumor samples were transduced using a replication-incompetent virus and correlated with CAR expression. However, transduction was abolished by autologous ascitic fluid, despite the expression of CAR. We conclude that the use of adenoviruses for ovarian cancer gene therapy will require testing in the presence of inhibitory factors in ascitic fluid. The clinical use of adenoviral vectors may require circumvention of such inhibitory factors and the use of replication competent adenovirus to enable efficient viral penetration of the cancer.

Indexed as

Transduction, GeneticAdenoviridaeAgedAged, 80 and overAscitic FluidCoxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor-Like Membrane ProteinFemaleGenetic TherapyHumansIntegrin beta3Middle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsReceptors, VirusTumor Cells, CulturedCLMP protein, humanCoxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor-Like Membrane ProteinIntegrin beta3Receptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID20539322
OpenAlexW2061917259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.