Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20538243›Full record

ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2010

Asking the why questions: a career in science.

Margaret M Heitkemper

Open access · goldAbstract readAutobiographyBiographyHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret M HeitkemperDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA. heit@u.washington.edu <heit@u.washington.edu>
Neurobehavioral Systems · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the career path of one woman scientist and identifies the factors that promote a productive and rewarding career. Factors include a strong personal interest in the area of study, mentorship at all stages of development, collaborative relationships with colleagues in and beyond one's discipline, and family and social support. A career focused on understanding the role of stress in gastrointestinal distress is described.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceScienceCooperative BehaviorFemaleHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMentorsTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited StatesWomenWomen's RightsWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID20538243
PMCPMC11922122
OpenAlexW1965066664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.