Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20537966›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2010

Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Franca Podo, Lutgarde M C Buydens, Hadassa Degani, Riet Hilhorst, Edda Klipp, Ingrid S Gribbestad, Sabine Van Huffel, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Jan Luts, Daniel Monleon and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 299 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic value of survivin expression in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomarkers derived from CmP signal network in triple negative breast cancers.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Franca PodoDepartment of Cell Biology and Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy. franca.podo@iss.it
Lutgarde M C Buydens
Hadassa Degani
Riet Hilhorst
Edda Klipp
Ingrid S Gribbestad
Sabine Van Huffel
Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Jan Luts
Daniel Monleon
Geert J Postma
Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra
Filippo Santoro
Hans Wouters
Hege G Russnes
Therese Sørlie
Elda Tagliabue
Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
FEMME Consortium
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLOslo University Hospital · NOIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITKU Leuven · BEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESNatural and Medical Sciences Institute · DENorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOPamGene (Netherlands) · NLWeizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), characterized by absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and lack of overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), are typically associated with poor prognosis, due to aggressive tumor phenotype(s), only partial response to chemotherapy and present lack of clinically established targeted therapies. Advances in the design of individualized strategies for treatment of TNBC patients require further elucidation, by combined 'omics' approaches, of the molecular mechanisms underlying TNBC phenotypic heterogeneity, and the still poorly understood association of TNBC with BRCA1 mutations. An overview is here presented on TNBC profiling in terms of expression signatures, within the functional genomic breast tumor classification, and ongoing efforts toward identification of new therapy targets and bioimaging markers. Due to the complexity of aberrant molecular patterns involved in expression, pathological progression and biological/clinical heterogeneity, the search for novel TNBC biomarkers and therapy targets requires collection of multi-dimensional data sets, use of robust multivariate data analysis techniques and development of innovative systems biology approaches.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansPrecision MedicineReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSystems BiologyAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID20537966
PMCPMC5527939
OpenAlexW2143204308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.