Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20537196›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Comparative mitogenomics of Braconidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera) and the phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial genomes with special reference to Holometabolous insects.

Shu-jun Wei, Min Shi, Michael J Sharkey, Cornelis van Achterberg, Xue-xin Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biology and Comparative Mitogenomics ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  10. The complete mitochondrial genome of the parasitoidMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shu-jun WeiState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Min Shi
Michael J Sharkey
Cornelis van Achterberg
Xue-xin Chen
China National Rice Research Institute · CNNatural History Museum Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Kentucky · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimal mitochondrial genomes are potential models for molecular evolution and markers for phylogenetic and population studies. Previous research has shown interesting features in hymenopteran mitochondrial genomes. Here, we conducted a comparative study of mitochondrial genomes of the family Braconidae, one of the largest families of Hymenoptera, and assessed the utility of mitochondrial genomic data for phylogenetic inference at three different hierarchical levels, i.e., Braconidae, Hymenoptera, and Holometabola.

resultsSeven mitochondrial genomes from seven subfamilies of Braconidae were sequenced. Three of the four sequenced A+T-rich regions are shown to be inverted. Furthermore, all species showed reversal of strand asymmetry, suggesting that inversion of the A+T-rich region might be a synapomorphy of the Braconidae. Gene rearrangement events occurred in all braconid species, but gene rearrangement rates were not taxonomically correlated. Most rearranged genes were tRNAs, except those of Cotesia vestalis, in which 13 protein-coding genes and 14 tRNA genes changed positions or/and directions through three kinds of gene rearrangement events. Remote inversion is posited to be the result of two independent recombination events. Evolutionary rates were lower in species of the cyclostome group than those of noncyclostomes. Phylogenetic analyses based on complete mitochondrial genomes and secondary structure of rrnS supported a sister-group relationship between Aphidiinae and cyclostomes. Many well accepted relationships within Hymenoptera, such as paraphyly of Symphyta and Evaniomorpha, a sister-group relationship between Orussoidea and Apocrita, and monophyly of Proctotrupomorpha, Ichneumonoidea and Aculeata were robustly confirmed. New hypotheses, such as a sister-group relationship between Evanioidea and Aculeata, were generated. Among holometabolous insects, Hymenoptera was shown to be the sister to all other orders. Mecoptera was recovered as the sister-group of Diptera. Neuropterida (Neuroptera + Megaloptera), and a sister-group relationship with (Diptera + Mecoptera) were supported across all analyses.

conclusionsOur comparative studies indicate that mitochondrial genomes are a useful phylogenetic tool at the ordinal level within Holometabola, at the superfamily within Hymenoptera and at the subfamily level within Braconidae. Variation at all of these hierarchical levels suggests that the utility of mitochondrial genomes is likely to be a valuable tool for systematics in other groups of arthropods.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsAT Rich SequenceBase CompositionBase SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene RearrangementGenome, MitochondrialHymenopteraMaleMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID20537196
PMCPMC2890569
OpenAlexW2103104820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.