Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20536555›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2010

The transcriptional control of the perforin locus.

Matthew E Pipkin, Anjana Rao, Mathias G Lichtenheld

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CD4Trends in cancer · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 4-1BB and cytokines trigger human NK, γδ T, and CD8Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Cytotoxic CD4Immunity · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew E PipkinDepartment of Signaling and Gene Expression, The La Jolla Institute of Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. mpipkin@liai.org
Anjana Rao
Mathias G Lichtenheld
Harvard University · USLa Jolla Institute for Immunology · US

Funding

University of Miami Developmental Center for AIDS Research (D-CFAR)P30AI073961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ALLAN E RODRIGUEZ · 2007 to 2026
$33.8M
REGULATED ACCESSIBILITY OF A CYTOKINE GENE LOCUSR01AI044432 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI RAO, ANJANA · 1999 to 2014
$7.7M
MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF PERFORIN GENE REGULATIONR01CA055811 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LICHTENHELD, MATHIAS GEORG · 1998 to 2001
$433k
Mechanics of LCR action on perforin to establish cytotoxicity in NK cells and CTLF32CA126247 · NCI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI PIPKIN, MATTHEW EUGENE · 2007 to 2010
$155k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA126247NCI NIH HHS F32CA126247NIAID NIH HHS 5P30AI073961-02NIAID NIH HHS AI44432NIAID NIH HHS AI707088NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI073961NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI044432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryNatural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) use cytotoxic granules containing perforin and granzymes to lyse infected or malignant host cells, thereby providing immunity to intracellular microbes and tumors. Perforin is essential for cytotoxic granule-mediated killing. Perforin expression is regulated transcriptionally and correlates tightly with the development of cells that can exhibit cytotoxic activity. Although a number of genes transcribed by T cells and NK cells have been studied, the cell-specificity of perforin gene expression makes it an ideal model system in which to clarify the transcriptional mechanisms that guide the development and activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes. In this review, we discuss what is known about perforin expression and its regulation, then elaborate on recent studies that utilized chromosome transfer and bacterial artificial chromosome transgenics to define a comprehensive set of cis-regulatory regions that control transcription of the human PRF1 gene in a near-physiologic context. In addition, we compare the human and murine Prf1 loci and discuss how transcription factors known to be important for driving CTL differentiation might also directly regulate the cis-acting domains that control Prf1. Our review emphasizes how studies of PRF1/Prf1 gene transcription can illuminate not only the mechanisms of cytotoxic lymphocyte differentiation but also some basic principles of transcriptional regulation.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesCell DifferentiationCytotoxicity, ImmunologicGene Expression RegulationHumansKiller Cells, NaturalMicePerforinPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTranscription FactorsPerforinperforin 1, mousePore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsPRF1 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20536555
PMCPMC4749266
OpenAlexW1607475798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.