ArticleHereditas2010
Enhancing radiation hybrid mapping through whole genome amplification.
Article in Hereditas, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of two whole genome radiation hybrid panels for dromedary (Camelus dromedarius): 5000Scientific reports · 2018Article
- A duck RH panel and its potential for assisting NGS genome assembly.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- A high-resolution 15,000(Rad) radiation hybrid panel for the domestic cat.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation hybrid (RH) mapping is limited by the inherent genomic instability of RH clones entailing both, limited DNA sample amounts and genomic heterogeneity of the clones. Here the instability of RH clones is quantified and the suitability of the multiple strand displacement whole genome amplification method (WGA) for radiation hybrid mapping is assessed. To quantify the instability of RH clones, eleven clones of a 10,000(Rad) rhesus macaque radiation hybrid panel were passaged ten times and analyzed by interspersed repeat sequence specific quantitative PCR and by genotyping of 46 macaque chromosome 5 STS markers. The quantitative PCR data indicate an average loss of 55% of the donor DNA over 10 passages. Over the same period, a dropout of 46.2% of the STS markers was observed. These data indicate a genome wide half-life of the donor DNA of 8.7 passages and of 10.6 passages for the chromosome 5 markers. The genotyping data of the genomic RH DNA were compared to three sets of WGA experiments: 1) single wgaDNA amplifications, 2) six WGA replicates, and 3) re-amplification of wga DNA. The assays demonstrated concordance rates of 97.6%, 98% and 99.3%, respectively, and indicated the marker specificity of some repeated WGA dropouts. The study confirms that WGA is suitable for RH mapping studies should enable the accurate analysis of almost an infinite numbers of markers. WGA will allow the analysis of earliest RH clone passages, thus limiting their heterogeneity and RH mapping artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.