ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2010
Medical clerkships do not reduce common prescription errors among medical students.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do educational interventions improve prescribing skills of medical students compared to no additional learning? A systematic review.Medical education online · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Teaching therapy decision-making to medical students: a prospective mixed-methods evaluation of a curricular innovation.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Clarifying learning experiences in student-run clinics: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2018Article
- Elaboration and Validation of the Medication Prescription Safety Checklist.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2017Article
- Using Team-based Learning to Teach a Hybrid Pharmacokinetics Course Online and in Class.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- A novel approach to teaching pharmacotherapeutics--feasibility of the learner-centered student-run clinic.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- The effect of different levels of realism of context learning on the prescribing competencies of medical students during the clinical clerkship in internal medicine: an exploratory study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Article
- The feasibility of incorporating structured therapeutic consultations with real patients into the clinical clerkship internal medicine.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2012Article
- Prescription writing: a lost art?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prescribing correctly represents one of the most essential skills of a doctor when it comes to patient safety. Unfortunately, prescribing errors still account for a large proportion of avoidable drug-related problems (DRP). Despite this shortcoming, many medical schools do not provide specific prescribing training and assume that students acquire sufficient prescribing skills during regular medical clerkships. We therefore investigated whether there is an association between the individual time spent by students in internal-medicine clerkships and the number of prescription errors committed in a standardized prescribing test for common drug-related problems in a medical inpatient setting. Seventy-four fifth-year medical students (25 +/- 3 yrs, 24 m, 50 f) who had completed their formal pharmacology training filled in prescription charts for two standardized patient paper cases. The charts were rated by two blinded consultants from the field of internal medicine using a checklist for common prescription errors. Students were divided into three groups according to the number of weeks previously spent in internal-medicine clerkships. Group differences in the number of prescription errors made were subsequently examined. Students committed 69% +/- 12% of all possible prescription mistakes. There was no significant difference between the group without clerkships in internal medicine (G1) (71 +/- 9%), the group with one to four weeks (G2) (67 +/- 15%), and the group with more than five weeks of clerkships (G3) (71 +/- 10%), p = .76. Medical students do not seem to acquire the necessary skills to avoid common prescription errors during regular clerkships in internal medicine. This study provides evidence to suggest that specific prescription training within medical education is warranted in order to prevent DRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20535451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.