ArticleDer Orthopade2010
[Traumatic vertebral body fractures and osteoporosis: value of cement augmentation].
Article in Der Orthopade, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of percutaneous vertebroplasty: an epidemiological nationwide study in Italy from 2009 to 2015.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021Article
- Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013Article
- Intraoperative PEEP-ventilation during PMMA-injection for augmented pedicle screws: improvement of leakage rate in spinal surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic vertebral body fractures are different from the osteoporotic vertebral sintering fractures with regard to accruement, classification and surgical treatment. The standard therapeutic regimen for traumatic vertebral fracture implies sufficient analgetic as well as antiosteoporotic medication and physiotherapy. In cases of A1 fractures and A2.1/A2.2 fractures, minimally invasive treatment strategies have proven to be appropriate treatment options when conservative treatment fails. Unstable fractures, the presence of neurological deficits or stenosis of the canal require conventional operative treatment. Due to reduced bone quality and age-dependent biomechanical changes, distinct operative procedures and strategies - cement augmentation of pedicle screws, additional cement augmentation of the fractured vertebra - for complex traumatic vertebral fractures have been established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.