Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20535202›Full record

ReviewNature2010

Brain function and chromatin plasticity.

Catherine Dulac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Hypothalamic Epigenetic Landscape in Dietary Obesity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Nature communications · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Abnormal methylation in theQRB discovery · 2022
    Article
  17. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Catherine DulacHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. dulac@fas.harvard.edu

Funding

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION COMPONENTS IN THE VOMERONASAL ORGANR01DC003903 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DULAC, CATHERINE · 1999 to 2008
$3.9M
Genetic analysis of brain circuits underlying pheromone signalingR01DC009019 · NIDCD · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI DULAC, CATHERINE · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003903NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characteristics of epigenetic control, including the potential for long-lasting, stable effects on gene expression that outlive an initial transient signal, could be of singular importance for post-mitotic neurons, which are subject to changes with short- to long-lasting influence on their activity and connectivity. Persistent changes in chromatin structure are thought to contribute to mechanisms of epigenetic inheritance. Recent advances in chromatin biology offer new avenues to investigate regulatory mechanisms underlying long-lasting changes in neurons, with direct implications for the study of brain function, behaviour and diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBrainChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA MethylationGenomic ImprintingHistonesHumansInheritance PatternsNeuronal PlasticityHistones

Identifiers

PMID20535202
PMCPMC3075582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.