Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20534830›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010

Acute disruption of the NMDA receptor subunit NR1 in the honeybee brain selectively impairs memory formation.

Laurenz Müssig, Antje Richlitzki, Reinhard Rössler, Dorothea Eisenhardt, Randolf Menzel, Gérard Leboulle

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Olfactory coding in honeybees.Cell and tissue research · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurenz MüssigNeurobiologie, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Antje Richlitzki
Reinhard Rössler
Dorothea Eisenhardt
Randolf Menzel
Gérard Leboulle
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory formation is a continuous process composed of multiple phases that can develop independently from each other. These phases depend on signaling pathways initiated after the activation of receptors in different brain regions. The NMDA receptor acts as a sensor of coincident activity between neural inputs, and, as such, its activation during learning is thought to be crucial for various forms of memory. In this study, we inhibited the expression of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor in the honeybee brain using RNA interference. We show that the disruption of the subunit expression in the mushroom body region of the honeybee brain during and shortly after appetitive learning selectively impaired memory. Although the formation of mid-term memory and early long-term memory was impaired, late long-term memory was left intact. This indicates that late long-term memory formation differs in its dependence on NMDA receptor activity from earlier memory phases.

Indexed as

MemoryRNA InterferenceAnimalsAssociation LearningBeesBlotting, WesternBrainConditioning, ClassicalCuesMemory, Short-TermMicroinjectionsMushroom BodiesReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small InterferingTime FactorsNR1 NMDA receptorReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRNA, Double-StrandedRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID20534830
PMCPMC6632693
OpenAlexW2128109065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.