Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20534527›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Injectable hydrogel properties influence infarct expansion and extent of postinfarction left ventricular remodeling in an ovine model.

Jamie L Ifkovits, Elena Tous, Masahito Minakawa, Masato Morita, J Daniel Robb, Kevin J Koomalsingh, Joseph H Gorman, Robert C Gorman, Jason A Burdick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Injectable biodegradable microcarriers for iPSC expansion and cardiomyocyte differentiation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jamie L IfkovitsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Elena Tous
Masahito Minakawa
Masato Morita
J Daniel Robb
Kevin J Koomalsingh
Joseph H Gorman
Robert C Gorman
Jason A Burdick

Funding

Surgery to Prevent Post Infarction Ventricular RemodelingR01HL063954 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C · 2001 to 2018
$9.8M
Quantitative Methods for Optimizing IMR RepairR01HL073021 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C, SACKS, MICHAEL S · 2004 to 2022
$7.6M
Echocardiography to Predict Recurrent IMR After Surgical Mitral Valve ReplacementR01HL103723 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C, HUNG, JUDY W · 2011 to 2020
$5.3M
Modified Late Infarct Reperfusion to Prevent Post MI CHFR01HL071137 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C · 2003 to 2006
$2.0M
Strain induced myopathy in post infarction heart failureR01HL076560 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, JOSEPH H · 2005 to 2008
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL63954NHLBI NIH HHS HL73021NHLBI NIH HHS HL76560NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL063954NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071137NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073021NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076560NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent trend has emerged that involves myocardial injection of biomaterials, containing cells or acellular, following myocardial infarction (MI) to influence the remodeling response through both biological and mechanical effects. Despite the number of different materials injected in these approaches, there has been little investigation into the importance of material properties on therapeutic outcomes. This work focuses on the investigation of injectable hyaluronic acid (MeHA) hydrogels that have tunable mechanics and gelation behavior. Specifically, two MeHA formulations that exhibit similar degradation and tissue distribution upon injection but have differential moduli (approximately 8 versus approximately 43 kPa) were injected into a clinically relevant ovine MI model to evaluate the associated salutary effect of intramyocardial hydrogel injection on the remodeling response based on hydrogel mechanics. Treatment with both hydrogels significantly increased the wall thickness in the apex and basilar infarct regions compared with the control infarct. However, only the higher-modulus (MeHA High) treatment group had a statistically smaller infarct area compared with the control infarct group. Moreover, reductions in normalized end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were observed for the MeHA High group. This group also tended to have better functional outcomes (cardiac output and ejection fraction) than the low-modulus (MeHA Low) and control infarct groups. This study provides fundamental information that can be used in the rational design of therapeutic materials for treatment of MI.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomechanical PhenomenaCohort StudiesHemodynamicsHumansHyaluronic AcidHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogelsMaleMyocardial InfarctionPolymersSheepTreatment OutcomeVentricular RemodelingBiocompatible MaterialsHyaluronic AcidHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateHydrogelsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID20534527
PMCPMC2895138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.