ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2010
[Diabetic maculopathy and retinopathy. Functional and sociomedical significance].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of intraocular anti-VEGF injections versus anti-VEGF combined with steroids or steroid monotherapy for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficiency analysis by mfERG and OCT of intravitreal injection with ranibizumab on diabetic macular edema.International journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Diabetic retinopathy - ocular complications of diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe incidence of diabetic microvascular complications is expected to increase by 20-50% in the coming years. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is already a leading cause of blindness in the working-age population in developed countries, and its impact is expected to increase dramatically.
methodsRecent literature on the epidemiology and impact of diabetic microangiopathy (maculopathy) on visual function was reviewed to provide a comprehensive overview of the functional and socioeconomic consequences of diabetic retinal microangiopathy and new therapeutic strategies.
resultsThe first changes indicating diabetic microangiopathy are detectable shortly after the development of hyperglycemia, and in the long term they induce severe organ damage. More resources are used for this condition's treatment than for the treatment of hyperglycemia, corresponding to an enormous sociomedical burden of disease. Early detection of increased retinal vascular permeability may help control treatment effects. The control of recognized risk factors for the development and progression of DME, namely hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia, as well as of hypertension has remained the cornerstone of therapy and serves as the basis for preserving visual function.
conclusionsModern treatment options, begun early, may result in a remarkably delayed occurrence of irreversible diabetic microvascular pathologies, particularly diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy. Ophthalmological screening nowadays aims at earlier recognition of at-risk individuals to optimize the therapeutic strategy--that is, before visual impairment is imminent. Close interdisciplinary medical cooperation and implementation of new therapeutic options may provide the foundation for success in terms of maintaining visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.