ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2010
Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complete genome sequence and analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain used for sugarcane spirit production.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021Article
- High hydrostatic pressure activates gene expression that leads to ethanol production enhancement in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae distillery strain.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2013Article
- High hydrostatic pressure activates transcription factors involved in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress tolerance.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The stress sensitivity of different wild-type strains was evaluated, as well as the response of cells arrested at different cell cycle positions to high hydrostatic pressure (HPP). HHP was chosen both for its importance in food decontamination and assessment of its suitability as a model for stress in general and understanding the yeast stress response. Studies were conducted with four industrial strains and four laboratory wild-type yeast strains (two haploid and two diploid) that differed in their backgrounds. Fundamental differences were found between the laboratory and industrial populations. Industrial strains were clearly more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure and ethanol stresses than the laboratory strains. However, ethanol production was higher in industrial strains than laboratory strains. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between ploidy and stress resistance. Yeast cells arrested in the G1 phase led to an enhancement in pressure tolerance compared to unarrested, G2 arrested, and S arrested cells. Moreover, cells arrested in the S phase were more sensitive to hydrostatic pressure than cells arrested in the G2 phase. Again, industrial strains were more sensitive than laboratory strains. HHP responses of industrial yeasts correlated well with both ethanol concentration and temperature stress, which suggests that it would be a useful model stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.