Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2010
Endocytoscopic classification of preneoplastic lesions in the colorectum.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02324374 (The Role of in Vivo Real Time Endocytoscopy in Diagnosing Colorectal Neoplasia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of in Vivo Real Time Endocytoscopy in Diagnosing Colorectal Neoplasia
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Ultra-Magnifying Endocytoscopic and Hematoxylin-Eosin-Stained Images of Lung Specimens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Image enhanced colonoscopy: updates and prospects-a review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Review
- New application of endocytoscope for histopathological diagnosis of colorectal lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Endocytoscopy: technology and clinical application in the lower GI tract.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020Review
- Comparison of the endocytoscopic and clinicopathologic features of colorectal neoplasms.Endoscopy international open · 2016Article
- Clinical usefulness of endocytoscopy in the remission stage of ulcerative colitis: a pilot study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Assessment of the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability of endocytoscopy in Barrett's esophagus: a pilot ex-vivo study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Ultra high magnification endoscopy: Is seeing really believing?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2012Article
- New imaging techniques and opportunities in endoscopy.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to assess the capability of endocytoscopy (ECS) in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions in the colorectum and to validate an ECS classification.
methodsPatients with colorectal polypoid and nonpolypoid lesions < or =10 mm were prospectively included. ECS classification subgrouped nonneoplastic (EC 0) and neoplastic (EC 1-3) lesions. Lesions were observed at super-magnified view (450x) before endoscopic resection. Blinded pathological assessment was obtained.
resultsFifty-two lesions were examined in 49 patients (17 polypoid and 35 nonpolypoid). Final pathological diagnosis was normal mucosa or hyperplastic polyp in ten cases, low-grade adenoma in 29, high-grade adenoma in 11, and submucosal invasive cancer in two cases. Positive predictive values of each EC group were 100%, 93.1%, 90.1%, and 100%, respectively. ECS diagnosis correlated completely with pathology in the differentiation between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions.
conclusionsECS enabled observation of colorectal lesion at a subcellular level in vivo. The classification of ECS images had a good correlation with the final pathological diagnosis. ECS was useful to differentiate between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20532533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.